A Study on the Risk Factors of Low Back Pain in Computer Terminal Operators.
- Author:
Cheol Ho YI
1
;
Jung Rae PARK
;
Ae Ri CHA
;
Kwang Wook KOH
;
Young Wook KIM
;
Su Ill LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Preventive and Occupational Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Low back pain;
Ergonomics;
Videography
- MeSH:
Arm;
Busan;
Cohort Studies;
Computer Terminals*;
Education;
Elbow;
Foot;
Head;
Human Engineering;
Humans;
Intention;
Knee;
Low Back Pain*;
Occupational Health;
Prevalence;
Risk Factors*;
Workplace
- From:Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
1999;11(2):264-275
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Low back pain in computer terminal operators is a very common but important symptom. While the occupational risk factors of low back pain were approved obscurely, there have been few studies on analysis or understanding of occupational risk factors. Therefore, we studied occupational risk factors of low back pain, especially for ergonomic factors as well as general characteristics of workers. We selected 98 subjects for this study, computer terminal operators ordinary using computers in Pusan. We calculated the subjective severity of low back pain of each operator by the Low Back Pain Scoring System. The relation of low back pain score to general characteristics of worker was also analyzed. We analyzed the relationship between low back pain score and individual efforts to prevent low back pain. We measured the ergonomic factors of each computer terminal operator - Trunk Jnclination(TI), Arm Flexion(AF), Elbow Angle(EA), Head Tilting(HT), Knee Angle(KA), using of foot plate and gap between the popliteum and chair. The correlations between these ergonomic factors and low back pain score were then analyzed. And the results are as follows: 1. The prevalence rate of low back pain in computer terminal operators was 39.8% in this study, when low back pain score was converted by the low back pain scoring system. 2. According to general characteristics of workers related to low back pain, the scores were higher in the older age group, the married and the longer work carriers. (p < 0.05) 3. In the analysis of the relationship between low back pain score and individual effort to prevent low back pain, regular exercise, history of schooling for prevention of low back pain, and declaration of intention to participate in low back pain education or exercise were stastistically significant(p < 0.05). And the more severe the low back pain, the higher the intention to participate in low back pain education they had in this study. 4. In the analyses of relationships or correlations between low back pain score and each of the 7 categories of ergonomic factors, only head tilting had a weak reverse correlation with low back pain(r=-0.2999, p < 0.01). From now on, cohort studies for the risk factors of low back pain of workers, who have been forced to work in non-ergonomical positioning at the work site, will be necessary. On the background of these ergonomic studies, the occupational health profession should be required to manage ergonomic working conditions.
