Comparison of clinical characteristics of patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, reflux hypersensitivity or functional heartburn
10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20200108-00011
- VernacularTitle:非糜烂性胃食管反流病、反流高敏感和功能性烧心患者临床特征比较
- Author:
Wenzhu YAO
1
;
Ajing ZHANG
;
Jia DI
;
Manli CUI
;
Mingxin ZHANG
;
Jun ZHANG
Author Information
1. 西安医学院第一临床医学院内科学教研室 710032
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestion
2020;40(10):669-673
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical characteristics of patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH), in order to help the differential diagnosis and treatment of the three diseases.Methods:From October 2016 to February 2019, 64 patients with persistent heartburn who had negative endoscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University and with negative results of endoscopy examination were consecutively selected, which included 26 NERD patients (NERD group), 12 RH patients (RH group) and 26 FH patients (FH group). The gender, age, body mass index (BMI), presence of hiatus hernia, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment effect, the score and incidence of gastroesophageal symptoms within one month before visit, and the incidence of overlapping functional dyspepsia (FD), postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) of the three groups were compared. One-way analysis of variance, least-significant difference, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age or incidence of esophageal hiatal hernia between NERD group, RH group and FH group (all P>0.05). BMI of NERD group was higher than that of FH group ((23.74±3.10) kg/m 2 vs. (21.26±2.75) kg/m 2), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=3.066, P=0.003). The effective rate of PPI treatment in NERD group was higher than those of RH group and FH group (19, 4, and 11 cases, respectively), the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=5.428 and 5.042, P=0.020 and 0.025). The score and incidence of burning sensation in upper abdomen of NERD group were both lower than those of FH group (0, 0 to 0 vs. 0, 0 to 5; 7.7%, 2/26 vs. 38.5%, 10/26), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-2.756, P=0.006; χ2=6.933, P=0.008). There were no statistically significant differences in the score of heartburn symptoms, or the scores and incidence of chest pain, reflux, globular sensation of hysteria, burning sensation of throat, cough, epigastric pain, early satiety or post meal fullness, belching, nausea or vomiting between NERD group, RH group and FH group (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overlapping FD or overlapping PDS between the NERD group, RH group and FH group (both P>0.05), but the incidence of overlapping EPS of FH group was higher than that of NERD group (46.2%, 12/26 vs. 11.5%, 3/26), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=7.589, P=0.013). Conclusions:There are certain differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with NERD, RH or FH, mainly reffected in the PPI treatment effects and whether overlapping EPS. The higher incidence of FH overlapping EPS further strengthens the hypothesis that functional gastrointestinal disorders have a common pathophysiological mechanism.
