Different reconstruction methods of inferior vena cava in the ex-vivo liver resection and auto-transplantation for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis
	    		
		   		
		   			 
		   		
	    	
    	 
    	10.3760/cma.j.cn421203-20191106-00403
   		
        
        	
        		- VernacularTitle:不同下腔静脉重建方式在离体肝切除和自体肝移植治疗肝AE中的应用
- Author:
	        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Maimaitinijiati YUSUFUKADIER·
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        			1
			        			
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Aji TUERGANAILI·
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Bo RAN
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Tiemin JIANG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Shalayiadang PAIZULA·
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Ruiqing ZHANG
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Yingmei SHAO
			        		
			        		;
		        		
		        		
		        		
			        		Hao WEN
			        		
			        		
		        		
		        		
		        		
    Author Information Author Information
 
			        		
			        		
			        			1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院消化血管外科中心肝胆包虫外科,乌鲁木齐 830054
 
 
- From:
	            		
	            			Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
	            		
	            		 2020;41(3):180-184
	            	
            	
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- 
		        	Abstract:
			       	
			       		
				        
				        	Objective:To explore the application of different reconstruction methods of retrohepatic inferior vena cava (RHIVC) in the ex-vivo liver resection and auto-transplantation(ELRA)for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE).Methods:The 88 patients with end-stage hepatic AE treated by ELRA from August 2010 to December 2018 were divided into 3 groups according to the different methods of RHIVC reconstruction, respectively , group A, autologous vascular repair and reconstruction group (n=50); group B, RHIVC replacement group (n=31); group C, RHIVC resection without reconstruction group (n=7), and the clinical data were analyzed and followed up.Results:The average operation time of group A, B and C was 16.32±3.20 h, 15.99±3.32 h, 16.86±4.18 h ( P>0.05), The average anhepatic phase was398.48±104.12 min, 389.41±135.25 min, 337.43±108.65 min( P>0.05), The differences were not statistically significant. The average hospital stays after surgery in the three groups were 30.64±18.54 d, 25.94±16.37 d, 51.29±29.43 d ( P<0.05), There were significant statistical differences, and the results showed that the group B was significantly less than other two groups. The incidence of IVC related complications in group A and B was 20.0% and 9.7%. Among all the subjects, RHIVC stenosis was found in 9 patients and thrombus was formed in 4 patients in postoperative. Conclusions:RHIVC reconstruction methods can be selected appropriately according to the defect degree of lumen after resection.