Interobserver variation in the morphological evaluation of nuclear features of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary like nuclear features
10.3760/cma.j.cn311282-20200217-00072
- VernacularTitle:具有乳头样核特征的非浸润性甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤细胞核特征判读一致性研究
- Author:
Peng SU
1
;
Xiaofang ZHANG
;
Honggang LIU
;
Xiaolong JI
;
Tiesheng WANG
;
Renya ZHANG
;
Qilin AO
;
Yue XU
;
Zhiyan LIU
Author Information
1. 山东大学齐鲁医院病理科，济南 250012
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
2020;36(7):598-602
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the interobserver variation of pathologists in the morphological evaluation of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features(NIFTP).Methods:Nine pathologists from different regions in China were selected to evaluate the digital slides of 30 cases of NIFTP. Three score system was applied, including nuclear size and shape, membrane irregularity, and chromatin features. Individual histologic features were scored as either present(1)or absent(0). A total score of 0 or 1 was considered inadequate for the diagnosis of NIFTP and a total score of 2 or 3 was considered sufficient for the diagnosis of NIFTP.Results:Overall, 9 doctors had weak consistency in the interpretation of the 30 cases(Kappa value 0.081 4), in which the interpretation of the membrane irregularity had the best consistency(Kappa value 0.193 6)and the interpretation of nuclear size and shape revealed the worst consistency(Kappa value 0.102 2). The overall consistency of the evaluation from the 7 senior pathologists was better than that of all the pathologists(Kappa value 0.134 1), but it was still weak. The consistency of nuclear membrane irregularity(Kappa value 0.267 4)and nuclear chromatin features(Kappa value 0.257 3)was weak, but much better than that of nuclear size and shape(Kappa value 0.073 0). The interobserver consistency in our study was lower than that in Asian study generally. However, the judgement on membrane irregularity in our senior pathologists was better than that in Asian study.Conclusion:The interobserver variation on the evaluation of the nuclear features of NIFTP is probably due to the education level, working experience, personal understanding of the diagnostic criteria, the regional difference, and some uncertain reasons. There is overall a weak consistency in the interpretation of NIFTP by Chinese pathologists, and it is necessary to popularize the diagnostic criteria and specify the criteria in detail. It is important to exclude high-risk genetic mutation using immunohistochemical staining or molecular examination on those patients with morphology of NIFTP.
