Development of obesity and diabetes from the perspective of related guidelines and the expert consensus: a comparative study based on bibliometric analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115624-20200528-00436
- VernacularTitle:从肥胖与糖尿病相关指南/专家共识看学科发展：基于文献计量分析的比较研究
- Author:
Qing WANG
1
;
Naishi LI
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院医学信息研究所，北京 100005
- From:
Chinese Journal of Health Management
2020;14(4):331-336
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the similarities and differences between obesity and diabetes in discipline development from the perspective of bibliometrics.Methods:Relevant literatures of guidelines and expert consensus in the field of obesity and diabetes were retrieved and collected from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Knowledge Service Platform. The literature publication trend, the country and region distribution of guideline and consensus, as well as the distribution of citation frequency were further analyzed from the perspective of bibliometrics.Results:The research of guidelines and consensus of obesity started later than the diabetes. Its related research was still in its infancy, while the field of diabetes was in its mature stage. The corresponding guidelines and expert consensus in the United States were the major concerns in whatever fields of obesity or diabetes. The total number of citations for representative guidelines in the field of obesity was much lower than the representative guidelines in the field of diabetes （3 479 vs. 11 678）. Conclusion:As a type of chronic disease, the obesity shows far inferior to diabetes in the development of professional disciplines in China.
