Effect of feedback pulmonary rehabilitation guidance on self-management of elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn115624-20200201-00035
- VernacularTitle:回授式肺康复指导在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者自我管理中的效果观察
- Author:
Yuzhen XIE
1
;
Mei XU
;
Yafei ZHOU
;
Yuan MA
Author Information
1. 郑州大学附属洛阳中心医院呼吸重症监护室，郑州 471000
- From:
Chinese Journal of Health Management
2020;14(3):230-234
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the effect of feedback pulmonary rehabilitation guidance on self-management of elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods:Ninety-four elderly patients with stable COPD that visited the outpatient department between January 2018 and January 2019 were selected. Block randomization methods were used to divide the patients into two groups: routine lung rehabilitation instruction group (referred to as the “routine group”) and feedback lung rehabilitation group (referred to as the “feedback group”). The feedback group received the instruction of feedback pulmonary rehabilitation guidance, while the routine group received the instruction of routine pulmonary rehabilitation guidance. The quality of life and the self-management ability of the two groups before and after the intervention were compared.Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the scores of the feedback and routine groups before the intervention of the COPD-specific self-management scale ( P>0.05). In the feedback group, the scores of emotional management, daily life management, symptom management, self-efficacy management, and information management on the COPD-specific self-management scale after the intervention were 45.01±5.31, 53.10±6.60, 25.88±3.03, 35.01±5.31, and 24.32±4.20, respectively, whereas those for the routine group were 40.23±5.19, 48.02±6.58, 22.88±3.01, 31.01±4.80, and 20.30±2.88, respectively. The scores of the feedback group were higher than the routine group and the difference was significant ( P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the feedback group and the routine group before the intervention of the respiratory disease questionnaire, i.e., the airways questionnaire 20-revised (AQ20-R) score ( P>0.05). The AQ20-R score of the feedback group after the intervention was 7.22±1.08, which was lower than that of the routine group (9.01±2.01); the difference was significant ( P<0.001). Conclusion:The application of feedback pulmonary rehabilitation guidance in the self-management of elderly patients with stable COPD can improve both their self-management ability and quality of life.
