p53 Gene Mutation, Tumor p53 Protein Overexpression, and Serum Anti-p53 Antibody in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
10.5230/jkgca.2003.3.4.206
- Author:
Jin gu BONG
1
;
Myung Hoon LEE
;
Kyung Eun SONG
;
Taebong KIM
;
Wansik YU
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Wallace Memorial Baptist Hospital, Busan, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gastric cancer;
p53 mutation;
p53 overexpression;
anti-p53 antibody
- MeSH:
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay;
Exons;
Genes, p53*;
Humans;
Immunohistochemistry;
Lymph Nodes;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2003;3(4):206-213
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The clinical implication of p53 mutation in gastric cancer is still unclear, as shown by the discordant results that continue to be reported in the literature. MATENRIALS AND METHODS: To assess p53 gene mutation, tumor p53 overexpression, and serum anti-p53 antibody, we employed a polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis, an immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibody DO-7, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. RESULTS: Of 169 surgical specimens of gastric cancer, mutation at exon 5~8 of the p53 was identified in 33 (19.5%) and was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis. Overexpression of p53 was found in 62 specimens (36.7%) and had a significant correlation with tumor differentiation. Serum anti-p53 antibody was positive in 18 patients (10.7%). Twenty-three of the mutated tumors (69.7%) and 39 of the non-mutated tumors (28.7%) displayed immunoreactivity. Twelve of the immunopositive tumors (19.4%) and 6 of the immunonegative tumors produced anti-p53 antibody. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.001 and P=0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference in survival according to the mutation of p53. CONCLUSION: Mutation and overexpression of p53 can be easily detected by immunohistochemistry. However, standardization of the immunohistochemical staining method, as well as guidelines for interpreting the stained result, will produce concordant results and thereby improve clinical application.
