The comparison of fully-covered self-expandable metal stent and plastic stent on the treatment of post liver transplantation anastomotic biliary stricture
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20191017-00339
- VernacularTitle:全覆膜自膨式可回收金属支架和塑料支架治疗肝移植术后胆管吻合口狭窄的效果比较
- Author:
Maodong YE
1
;
Weijie SU
;
Xiaogang LI
;
Yi JIE
;
Weiqiang JU
;
Anbin HU
;
Linwei WU
;
Yi MA
;
Xiaofeng ZHU
;
Xiaoshun HE
;
Dongping WANG
Author Information
1. 中山大学附属第一医院器官移植科一区，广州 510000
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2020;26(10):767-770
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effectiveness and safety of fully-covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) with plastic stent over the treatment of post liver transplantation anastomotic biliary stricture (AS).Methods:The clinical data of AS patients after liver transplantation admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2014 to April 2018 was collected for the retrospective study. According to different implanted stents, patients were divided into FCSEMS group and plastic stent group. The general information of the two groups of patients, surgical success rate, postoperative complications, the number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the number of indwelling stents and other indicators were compared and analyzed.Results:A total of 54 patients were enrolled, including 41 males and 13 females, with a median age of 48 (34-65) years. A total of 23 cases were included in the FCSEMS group and 31 cases were included in the plastic stent group. The overall technical success rate of the operation was 98.3% (176/179). In the FCSEMS group, there were 21 patients recovered and 2 patients were relieved; in the plastic stent group, 29 patients were recovered, 1 case was relieved, and 1 case failed. There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy and complication rate between the two groups (all P>0.05). The median stent indwelling time, ERCP times, and the number of indwelling stents in the FCSEMS group were 5.9 months, 2 times, and 1, respectively, and in the plastic stent group were 9.5 months, 4 times, and 8 respectively. There were statistical differences between the two groups (all P<0.05). Conclusions:FCSEMS for treatment of AS showed less duration of stenting, numbers of stents and endoscopic treatment sessions with the similar efficacy as plastic stents. It’s indicated that it’s necessary to pay attention to the probability of stent migration and pancreatitis.
