Study on dosimetric changes between initial and second treatment plans in IMRT for large volume NSCLC
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20190227-00066
- VernacularTitle:大体积肺癌IMRT初次及二次计划剂量学变化研究
- Author:
Jianxin REN
1
;
Yong YIN
;
Guanzhong GONG
;
Xinsen YAO
;
Zhujun HAN
;
Ming SU
;
Hong QUAN
Author Information
1. 武汉大学物理科学与技术学院 430072
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2020;29(10):872-876
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the cumulative dose of the target volume and organs at risk (OARs) in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for large volume non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on rigid and deformation registration methods. The dosimetric changes between the initial and second treatment plans were compared.Methods:Thirty patients treated with IMRT for large volume NSCLC with twice 4DCT scans acquired before radiotherapy and after 20 fractions of radiotherapy were recruited. The initial treatment plan (Plan 1) based on the average density projection CT (CT 1-avg) of the first 4DCT images and the second treatment plan (Plan 2) based on the average density projection CT (CT 2-avg) of the second 4DCT images were calculated. Then, the dose distributions of Plan 1 and Plan 2 were accumulated based on rigid and deformation registration methods to obtain Planrig and Plandef, respectively. Finally, the volume changes of gross tumor volume (GTV) and OARs between two CT scans were compared. The dose-volume parameters between Plan 1 and other plans (including Plan 2, Planrig and Plandef) were also statistically compared. Results:Compared with the initial CT scan, the mean volume of GTV and heart on the second CT was decreased by 44.2% and 5.5%, respectively, while the mean volume of ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung and total lung was increased by 5.2%, 6.2% and 5.8%, respectively (all P<0.05). Compared with Plan 1, the D 95%, D 98% and V 100% of target volume IGTV (GTV fusion of 10 4DCT phases) and PTV in Plan 2 did not significantly change (all P>0.05), and those in Planrig and Plandef were decreased (all P<0.05). The dose-volume parameters of spinal-cord, heart, ipsilateral lung and total lung in Plan 2, Planrig and Plandef were significantly lower than those in Plan 1(all P<0.05). Among them, the V 30Gy and D mean of heart were decreased by 27.3%, 16.5%, 15.3% and 15.2%, 6.6%, 5.6%, respectively. The V 20Gy and D mean of total lung were decreased by 15.6%, 4.5%, 3.7% and 15.7%, 6.2%, 5.1%, respectively. Some dose-volume parameters (including D 95% and D 98% of target volume, V 40Gy of heart, V 20Gy and D mean of the ipsilateral lung and the total lung) of Plandef were higher than those in Planrig (all P<0.05). The Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of OARs after deformation registration were significantly higher than those after rigid registration ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The dose-volume parameters of OARs significantly differ between Plan 1 and Plan 2. Hence, all these parameters have a large degree of deviation in predicting radiation-induced injury of OARs. Nevertheless, the dose-volume parameters obtained by deformation registration can enhance the prediction accuracy.
