Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200410-00313
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜子宫广泛性切除术治疗早期子宫颈腺癌的疗效及安全性评价
- Author:
Yanan ZHANG
1
;
Bin LI
;
Yating WANG
;
Shuanghuan LIU
Author Information
1. 国家癌症中心 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院妇瘤科 100021
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2020;55(9):600-608
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma.Methods:A retrospective observational study was performed by reviewing medical records of patients with staging Ⅰb1-Ⅱa2 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2009) cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal radical hysterectomy from 2007 to 2017 in the Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The difference among clinicopathologic characteristics, surgery-related parameters and complications, and prognosis were analyzed between the laparoscopic group and abdominal group.Results:Two hundreds and ninety-three patients were included with 88 cases in laparoscopic group and 205 cases in abdominal group. （1） There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups （all P>0.05）, including age, body mass index, menopause status, history of abdominal surgery, clinical stage, tumor diameter, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, differentiation, lymph-vascular space invasion, positive of surgical margin, parametrial invasion, and lymph node metastasis. But the abdominal group showed a higher proportion of deep stromal invasion (38.5% vs 25.0%, P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between two groups with number of lymph nodes resected, urinary catheter retention, short-term surgical complications (including ureteral injury, ileus, infection, hydronephrosis and poor wound healing), and long-term complications (including voiding dysfunction, defecation dysfunction and lower limb edema； all P>0.05）. （2） The laparoscopic group was significantly associated with a longer operation time [(260±51) minutes vs (244±53) minutes, P<0.05], but less bleeding (100 ml vs 300 ml, P<0.01), shorter hospital stay [(13±5) days vs (16±8) days, P<0.01] and lower incidence of lymphedema (12.5% vs 27.8%, P<0.01). （3） The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 85.7% vs 86.4%, P=0.971) and 5-year overall survival (OS; 91.4% vs 93.0%, P=0.657) of laparoscopic group were comparable to that of abdominal group. （4） Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymph node metastasis ( HR=2.44, 95% CI: 1.16-5.15, P=0.019) was independent poor prognostic factors related to PFS, while adenosquamous carcinoma ( HR=2.54, 95% CI: 1.02-6.35, P=0.046), lymph-vascular space invasion ( HR=3.86, 95% CI: 1.60-9.33, P=0.003) and lymph node metastasis ( HR=5.92, 95% CI: 2.45-14.34, P<0.01) were independent poor prognostic factors related to OS. The laparoscopy surgery was not an independent poor prognostic factor ( P=0.396). Conclusion:The laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma has comparable prognosis to abdominal radical hysterectomy with a higher surgery quality.
