Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by O-arm navigation in treatment of sacroiliac joint complex injury
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2020.08.007
- VernacularTitle:O-arm导航辅助下经皮骶髂关节螺钉内固定治疗骶髂关节复合体损伤
- Author:
Zhengbing SU
1
;
Jie LI
;
Gang LUO
;
Yuchi DAI
;
Yong HAO
;
Yue ZHOU
Author Information
1. 陆军军医大学第二附属医院骨科，重庆 400037
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2020;36(8):709-713
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by O-arm navigation or C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy in the treatment of sacroiliac joint complex injury.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 32 patients with sacroiliac joint complex injury admitted to Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from July 2016 to January 2019.There were 21 males and 11 females, aged from 20 to 59 years (mean, 41.3 years). According to Tile classification, there were 7 patients with type B1 fracturs, 13 with type B2, 5 with type B3, 5 with type C1, and 2 with type C1. Group A ( n=17) had percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by O-arm navigation, while Group B ( n=15) had percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy. Time of single screw placement, time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, intraoperative bleeding volume and bone union time were measured. Reduction quality was evaluated by Matta standard score. Majeed function score was assessed 6 months at the latest follow-up. Complications were also observed. Results:All patients were followed up for 6-37 months (mean, 18.6 months). The time of sacroiliac joint screw placement [(27.3±5.1)minutes] and time of intraoperative fluoroscopy [(43.3±3.2)s] in Group A were significantly less than those in Group B [(52.3±5.9)minutes, (64.6±5.4)s] ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences between Group A and Group B in intraoperative bleeding [(17.8±2.6)ml vs. (20.7±3.1)ml] and bone union time [(13.4±1.4)weeks vs. (14.1±1.9)weeks] ( P>0.05). According to the reduction quality evaluated by Matta standard score, the good and excellent rate was 88% (15/17) in Group A and 87% (13/15) in Group B ( P>0.05). The good and excellent rate of the Majeed function score was 94% (16/17) in Group A and 87% (13/15) in Group B at the latest follow-up ( P>0.05). One patient in Group B demonstrated one screw slightly penetrating the anterior cortex of vertebral body. No neurovascular injury, wound infection, or screw loosening occurred. Conclusion:For sacroiliac joint complex injury, percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by O-arm navigation has advantages in the duration of screw placement and intraoperative fluoroscopy over percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy.
