Analysis of clinical effect of interventional treatment of arteriovenous fistula stenosis through arteriovenous approach
10.3760/cma.j.cn121361-20200604-00040
- VernacularTitle:经动、静脉途径介入治疗自体动静脉内瘘狭窄的临床效果分析
- Author:
Jingcun SU
1
;
Huawen XIA
;
Aihong SHEN
;
Haiyang WANG
;
Junbo LI
Author Information
1. 河北省邯郸市第一医院介入外科 056000
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2020;36(6):524-528
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical effect and perioperative complications of the treatment of autogenous arteriovenous fistula stenosis by arterial and venous approach.Methods:The clinical data of 120 patients with AVF stenosis and occlusion who were treated with interventional therapy and met the inclusion criteria were collected and analyzed by retrospective case-control study.from September 2017 to August 2018, 60 patients with internal fistula stenosis were treated by transarterial approach (arterial approach group), and from September 2018 to may 2019, 60 patients were treated with a new surgical scheme(venous approach group). The operation success rate, perioperative complications and patency rate of 3, 6, 12 months after operation were compared between the two groups.Results:(1) The technical success rate was 96.7% (58/60) and the clinical success rate was 91.7% (55/60) in the arterial approach group, and 95.0%(57/60) and 93.3%(56/60) in the venous approach group.There was no significant difference in the technical success rate and clinical success rate between the two groups ( P=0.718 and 1.000, respectively) (2) Perioperative complications: in the arterial approach group, 3 patients had hematoma at the puncture point, 2 pseudoaneurysms and 5 thrombosis.There were 3 patients with thrombosis in the venous access group, and the difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups was statistically significant (χ 2=4.227, P=0.036). (3)The primary patency rates at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation were 95.0%(57/60), 75.0%(45/60) and 60.0%(36/60) in the arterial approach group, and 96.7%(58/60), 71.7%(43/60) and 61.7%(37/60) in the venous access group, respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.718, 0.749, 0.885). Conclusion:The interventional treatment for autogenous arteriovenous fistula stenosis through artery and vein approach can achieve good effect.There were many complications during the perioperative period, It is suggested that venous approach is preferred.