Endovascular treatment of innominate artery stenosis or occlusion
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20200315-00284
- VernacularTitle:无名动脉狭窄或闭塞的腔内治疗
- Author:
Chengchao ZHANG
1
;
Yuhao JIAO
;
Yongquan GU
;
Lianrui GUO
;
Zhu TONG
;
Lixing QI
;
Shijun CUI
;
Jianming GUO
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学宣武医院血管外科，北京 100053
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2020;22(11):1640-1644
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the method and effect of endovascular treatment to innominate artery stenosis or occlusion.Methods:The data of 11 patients with stenosis or occlusion of innominate artery from January 2014 to November 2019 at Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University were collected. All patients received endovascular treatment. We summarized the changes of clinical symptoms, surgical methods, perioperative complications, stent patency, and analyzed the changes in systolic blood pressure and peak blood flow velocity on the involving side.Results:All 11 patients underwent endovascular treatment. The surgical technique success rate was 100%. All patients were followed up. The follow-up time was 4-69 months, with an average of (30.1±23.4)months. 2 patients used cerebral umbrella during the operation. 1 patient was performed ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy, 1 patient underwent contralateral carotid stent implantation, 1 patient was diagnosed as severe stenosis of the innominate artery and left common carotid artery, and an innominate artery stent implantation was performed at one stage, left common carotid artery stent implantation was performed after half a year. We done operation from the femoral artery puncture approach (6 patients), brachial artery puncture approach (2 patients), axillary artery and femoral artery puncture approach (1 patients), and right common carotid artery and the femoral artery puncture approach (2 patients). 3 patients had in-stent restenosis at 6, 7and 12 months after stenting, respectively. 1 patient underwent balloon dilatation, and 2 patients underwent re-stent implantation. We have not do further intervention to 1 case of in-stent occlusion occurred 14 months after the stenting, for the clinical symptoms did not improve significantly. The clinical re-intervention rate in this group was 3/11, and the primary patency rate was 7/11. The secondary patency rate was 10/11. The symptoms of 10 patients were relieved and the weakness of right upper extremity was not significantly changed in 1 patient. No puncture point complications occurred in all patients, and no cerebral infarction occurred during the perioperative period. There were statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure, blood pressure difference and peak blood flow velocity before and after the operation ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Endovascular treatment of innominate arterial stenosis or occlusion was safe and effective, and the appropriate surgical approach and plan should be selected according to the lesion characteristics and the whole body conditions.
