Clinical efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscope-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20191113-01332
- VernacularTitle:手助腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助在胃癌D2根治术中临床疗效的Meta分析
- Author:
Yupeng WU
1
;
Haiqiang ZHANG
;
Haijun WANG
;
Quanchao ZHANG
;
Jizhe WANG
;
Zhanxue ZHANG
Author Information
1. 河北医科大学第二医院胃肠外科，石家庄 050000
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2020;22(8):1157-1162
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and laparoscopic assisted surgery (LAS) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.Methods:Articles of the efficacy comparison of HALS and LAS in D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 2000 to 2019 published in PubMed, Cochrane library, EM-BASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Weipu, Chinese full-text database of Chinese Sci-Tech journals, Chinese biomedical literature database were retrieved, and the literatures were screened according to the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the two groups was evaluated, and the short-term indexes and complications for meta-analysis of the two groups were analyzed by using Revman 5.3 software.Results:A total of 1277 patients were included in 10 articles, including 629 in the HALS group and 648 in the LAS group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with the LAS group, the operation time was shorter in the HALS group (WMD=24.02, 95% CI: -40.41--7.62, P=0.004), but the auxiliary incision was slightly longer (WMD=0.27, 95% CI: 0.06-0.47, P=0.01), and there were no statistically significant difference in the remaining number of lymph node dissections (WMD=0.58, 95% CI: -1.22-2.39, P=0.53), intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-7.94, 95% CI: -16.21-0.33, P=0.06), gastrointestinal tract recovery time (WMD=0.00, 95% CI: -0.03- 0.04, P=0.85), total length of hospital stay (WMD=-0.14, 95% CI0: -0.36-0.09, P=0.23) and postoperative complications ( OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.58-1.37, P=0.61). Conclusions:Compared with the LAS for D2 radical surgery of advanced gastric cancer, HALS has significantly shorter operation time and is easier to perform than LAS, but the incision length is slightly increased. Physicians can choose the appropriate operation method according to the specific conditions of the operation and themselves.
