Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion of Cardiac-death Donor Lung in Pigs.
10.4285/jkstn.2014.28.3.154
- Author:
Hyo Chae PAIK
1
;
Seok Jin HAAM
;
Moo Suk PARK
;
Joo Han SONG
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hcpaik@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lung transplantation;
Tissue donors;
Organ preservation;
Warm ischemia
- MeSH:
Death;
Heart Arrest;
Humans;
Lung Diseases;
Lung Injury;
Lung Transplantation;
Lung*;
Organ Preservation;
Oxygen;
Perfusion*;
Swine*;
Tissue Donors*;
Vascular Resistance;
Waiting Lists;
Warm Ischemia
- From:The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation
2014;28(3):154-159
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease; however, the shortage of donor lungs has been a major limiting factor to increasing the number of LTx. Growing experience following LTx using donor lungs after cardiac death (DCD) has been promising, although concerns remain. The purpose of this study was to develop a DCD lung harvest model using an ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) system and to assess the function of presumably damaged lungs harvested from the DCD donor in pigs. METHODS: The 40 kg pigs were randomly divided into the control group with no ischemic lung injury (n=5) and the study group (n=5), which had 1 hour of warm ischemic lung injury after cardiac arrest. Harvested lungs were placed in the EVLP circuit and oxygen capacities (OC), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and peak airway pressure (PAP) were evaluated every hour for 4 hours. At the end of EVLP, specimens were excised for pathologic review and wet/dry ratio. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in OC (P=0.353), PVR (P=0.951), and PAP (P=0.651) was observed in both groups. Lung injury severity score (control group vs. study group: 0.700+/-0.303 vs. 0.870+/-0.130; P=0.230) and wet/dry ratio (control group vs. study group: 5.89+/-0.97 vs. 6.20+/-0.57; P=0.560) also showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The function of DCD lungs assessed using EVLP showed no difference from that of control lungs without ischemic injury; therefore, utilization of DCD lungs can be a new option to decrease the number of deaths on the waiting list.
