Comparison of the effects of laparoscopic catheterization and surgical incision catheterization on catheter-related complications and microinflammation in uremic peritoneal dialysis patients
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2020.05.014
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜法置管与手术切开法置管对尿毒症腹膜透析患者导管相关并发症及微炎症状态的影响
- Author:
Wei WU
1
;
Hong ZHU
;
Jiaxi CHEN
;
Guangjun LIU
Author Information
1. 浙江省，建德市第一人民医院肾内科 311600
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2020;27(5):572-576
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effects of laparoscopic and surgical catheterization on catheter-related complications and microinflammation in uremic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.Methods:According to different catheterization methods, 98 uremic patients who were scheduled to undergo peritoneal dialysis in the First People's Hospital of Jiande from January 2014 to March 2019 were divided into group A (38 cases), group B (60 cases). Laparoscopic catheterization was used in group A, and incision catheterization was used in group B. Surgical parameters, catheter complications, microinflammation and survival rate of early catheterization were observed in the two groups.Results:The operation time of group A was (35.00±3.14)min, which was shorter than that of group B [(50.00±5.17)min], and the operation cost of group A was (5 800.0±318.9)CNY, which was higher than that of group B [(3 400.0±297.4)CNY], and the visual analogue score (VAS) of group A was (2.33±0.31)points, which was lower than that of group B [(3.25±0.49)points], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups ( t=11.540, 9.317, 10.328, 36.578, all P<0.05). The incidence of catheter-related complications in group A was 10.53%(4/38), which was significantly lower than 28.33%(17/60) in group B (χ 2=4.383, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6(IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels between group A and group B before catheterization (all P>0.05). After catheterization, the levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-alpha in group B were (12.52±3.75)mg/L, (12.02±3.76)ng/L, (15.92±5.72)ng/L, respectively, which were higher than those in group A [(9.63±2.36)mg/L, (9.11±3.54)ng/L, (13.41±5.61)ng/L] ( t=4.244, 4.081, 4.510, all P<0.05). After 2 months of follow-up, the survival rate of dialysis tube technique was 89.47%(34/38) in group A and 71.67%(43/60) in group B, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ 2=4.382, P<0.05). Conclusion:Application of laparoscopic catheterization in uremic PD patients has satisfactory effect, light pain, fewer complications, mild inflammation and high survival rate of early catheterization technology, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
