Quantitative evaluation of magnetic resonance T2 mapping in Brucella spondylitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn231583-20191203-00341
- VernacularTitle:磁共振T2 mapping在布鲁菌脊柱炎患者中定量评价的探讨
- Author:
Hui GUO
1
;
Wenya LIU
;
Hua SHAO
;
Juan YAO
;
Tiheiran MAIJUDAN
;
Hongjun LI
Author Information
1. 新疆医科大学第一附属医院影像中心，乌鲁木齐 830054
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2020;39(10):760-763
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the characteristics and quantitative evaluation of Brucella spondylitis patients by magnetic resonance T2 mapping. Methods:A prospective clinical study was conducted to analyze the MRI data of 23 patients with brucellosis spondylitis diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2016 to September 2018, and 25 healthy volunteers were selected as the control group. MRI was used to examine the vertebral bodies of the subjects, and T2 mapping map was automatically generated. Regions of interest (ROI) were selected on the T2 mapping map to generate T2 mapping values automatically. The T2 mapping values of diseased vertebrae, adjacent unaffected vertebrae, paravertebral abscess and healthy volunteers were analyzed.Results:Among 48 MRI examinees, 23 cases were Brucella spondylitis, including 17 males and 6 females, aged (38.5 ± 13.4) years; 25 healthy volunteers, including 15 males and 10 females, aged (35.1 ± 12.7) years. In 23 patients with Brucella spondylitis, 5 thoracic vertebrae, 40 lumbar vertebrae and 7 sacral vertebrae were involved, with a total of 52 vertebral bodies. Among them, 11 (21.2%) vertebral bodies showed bone marrow edema on MRI, 41 (78.8%) vertebral bodies showed bone marrow edema and vertebral bone destruction. T2 mapping values of the diseased vertebrae, adjacent unaffected vertebrae and paravertebral abscess in Brucella spondylitis patients and normal vertebrae in healthy volunteers were (115.62 ± 11.37), (75.21 ± 5.57), (240.26 ± 30.67) and (77.29 ± 4.19) ms, respectively. There were significant differences between the diseased vertebrae in Brucella spondylitis and adjacent unaffected vertebrae in Brucella spondylitis, and there were significant differences between the diseased vertebrae in Brucella spondylitis and normal vertebrae in healthy volunteers ( t = 26.78, 19.42, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Magnetic resonance T2 mapping can be used to evaluate the pathological tissues in Brucella spondylitis patients, and it has certain guiding significance for the quantitative description and qualitative diagnosis.
