Inspiration of selecting peer review experts for nursing sci-tech journals with the review of different peer review′s conclusion papers
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200408-01716
- VernacularTitle:不同审稿结论稿件的评审对护理学期刊审稿人遴选工作的启示
- Author:
Xiufeng LIANG
1
;
Xiongfei WU
Author Information
1. 大连医科大学附属大连市中心医院 大连理论医学研究所 116013
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2020;36(22):1760-1761
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To discuss the method and strategy of selecting reviewers for nursing journals.Methods:Through the review practice of different review conclusions, this paper analyzed the reasons for the differences in review conclusions.Results:The methods and suggestions for selecting reviewers included more detailed research direction of reviewers and more comprehensive distribution of research direction; complementary "academic school" and "clinical school" in the same research direction; certain reserved candidates in hot research areas; full consideration of the energy and time of reviewers who hold concurrent administrative positions.Conclusion:The selection of reviewers of nursing journals should follow the characteristics of disciplines and fully consider the distribution of reviewers with different characteristics, so as to make the review process more professional and reliable.
