Effect of clinical nursing path on lung function in patients with severe pneumonia
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20191010-02835
- VernacularTitle:临床护理路径对重症肺炎急救护理患者肺功能的影响
- Author:
Xiumei GAO
1
;
Jiaxin SHI
;
Qing LIU
;
Yan XU
Author Information
1. 江苏省连云港市第一人民医院急诊科 222000
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2020;36(21):1667-1671
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the nursing effect of clinical nursing pathway in emergency care of severe pneumonia and its effect on lung function.Methods:A total of 90 patients with severe pneumonia in Lianyungang First People ′s Hospital of Jiangsu Province from June 2017 to July 2019 were selected as subjects. The randomized patients were divided into control group ( n=45 cases) and observation group ( n=45 cases). The control group received routine nursing. The observation group was combined with the clinical nursing pathway on the basis of the control group. Both groups were treated for 1 month. The symptom improvement time, lung function level and nursing satisfaction were compared. Results:The improvement time of wheezing (3.45 ± 1.06) d, the improvement time of antipyretic fever (3.48 ± 1.08) d, and the improvement time of lung rales (4.31 ± 0.49) d in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group [(7.01 ± 1.42) d, (4.56 ± 1.32) d, (6.62 ± 0.79) d] ( t value was 9.642, 7.375, 6.189, P <0.05); maximum voluntary minute ventilation (MVV) of the observation group in 1 month after nursing , Vital capacity (VC) and 1s forced expiratory volume (FEV1) levels were higher than before nursing ( P <0.05); MVV (71.42 ± 18.75) L, VC (72.41 ± 17.74)% and FEV1 were observed in the observation group 1 month after nursing (67.36 ± 18.48) L, all higher than (62.38 ± 16.69) L, (60.18 ± 15.69)% and (59.15 ± 17.13) L of the control group ( t value was 6.393, 5.544, 7.491, P <0.05); observation group after-care, nursing method, content, form of nursing, nursing service attitude, and nursing effect satisfaction were 97.78% (44/45), 95.56% (43/45), 97.78% (44/45), 93.33% (42/45 ), 95.56% (43/45), which were higher than 80.00% (36/45), 90.48% (38/45), 82.22% (37/45), 77.78% (35/45), 80.00% of the control group (36/45), with statistically significance ( χ2 value was 5.412-9.581, P <0.05). Conclusions:The clinical nursing pathway is effective for emergency nursing of patients with severe pneumonia. It can shorten the time of symptom disappearance, improve the lung function level and satisfaction of nursing, and it is worthy of popularization and application.
