Development and Prognosis of Non-Q Myocardial Infarction.
- Author:
In Han SONG
1
;
Hwa Sik SONG
Author Information
1. Emergency Medical Department, Medical College of Dankook University, Chunan, Korea. sssong@dankook.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Myocardial infarction;
Thrombolysis;
Non-Q infarcts;
Clinical outcome
- MeSH:
Heart Failure;
Humans;
Incidence;
Mortality;
Myocardial Infarction*;
Prognosis*;
Retrospective Studies;
Thrombolytic Therapy;
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2003;14(4):378-386
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: In the prethrombolytic era, patients with non-Q myocardial infarction (non-MI) exhibited a lower short-term mortality, but were at higher risk for inhospital and long-term reinfarction, leading to a higher long-term mortality rate than for patients with Q MI. The objective of this study was to determine whether the incidence of non-Q MI among and the prognosis for patients with ST-segment elevation and thrombolytic therapy were different from those among patients who did not have thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done for 222 patients of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation The analysis compared the rate of transformation of ST-elevation to Q MI and non-Q MI and the clinical outcome (30-day mortality, reinfarction, recurrent angina, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and new congestive heart failure (CHF)) of patients who subsequently developed a Q or non-Q MI postthrombolysis to those for the controls. RESULTS: The rate of non-Q MI was not significantly higher among patients receiving thrombolysis than among the control (31% vs 25%, p>0.1). Among patients receiving thrombolysis, the 30-day mortality (2.6% vs 0%), the inhospital reinfarction (10.3% vs 11.5%), and recurrent angina (20.6% vs 14.5%) were not significantly lower for those who developed a non-Q MI compared with either those who developed a Q MI or the control patients who developed non-Q MI, but left ventricular dysfunction (35.9% vs 55.2%) and new congestive heart failure (0 vs 10.3%) were significantly lower compared with those who developed Q MI. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving thrombolysis do not necessarily develop a non-Q MI and do not have a better prognosis than those who either develop a postthrombolysis Q MI or a non-Q MI after no thrombolysis.
