Clinical study of percutaneous coablation nucleoplasty for the treatment of discogenic low back pain
10.3760/cma.j.issn115396-20200713-00228
- VernacularTitle:经皮低温消融髓核成形术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛的临床研究
- Author:
Yubao HE
1
;
Zhiyang XU
;
Jieying WANG
;
Bo LIU
Author Information
1. 北京市垂杨柳医院骨科 100022
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2020;47(11):758-764
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of percutaneous coablation nucleoplasty (PCNP) in the treatment of discogenic low back pain (DLBP).Methods:From March 2015 to March 2019, the clinical data of 97 single segment DLBP patients with PCNP admitted to orthopaedic department of Beijing Chui Yang Liu hospital were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into PCNP group ( n=43) and control group ( n=54). The sex proportion, age, medical history, length of hospital stay, follow-up time, operation time, responsibility segment, Pfirrmann classification and complications were recorded. 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the operation, the routine outpatient reexamination and follow-up were conducted for 6-36 months. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by numeric rating scale (NRS) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) before, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the operation. Measurement data were presented by Mean± SD, t test was used for comparison between groups, and analysis of variance of repeated measurement data was used for comparison of NRS score and RMDQ score before and after treatment. The counting data were expressed by percentage, χ2 test or Fisher precision test was used for comparison between groups, and Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used for comparison between groups of follow-up time and hierarchical grouping data. Statistical software SPSS 20.0 was used to process the data, P< 0.05 was statistically significant. Results:The average operation time of PCNP patients was (36.3±13.2) min (15 to 65 min), and no complications occurred. After treatment, the NRS score and RMDQ score of the two groups decreased significantly( F组内=26.000, P=0.001; F组内=26.000, P=0.001), and the NRS score and RMDQ score of the PCNP group decreased more significantly( F组间=5.666, P=0.024; F组间=4.261, P=0.048), and the NRS score and RMDQ score of the PCNP group decreased more significantly with time ( F交互=26.000, P=0.028; F交互=26.000, P=0.010). Conclusion:PCNP with DLBP patients showed satisfied clinical results in pain relief and improve dysfunction. PCNP is a safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment method, which has a long therapeutic effect and is superior to conservative treatment.
