Analysis of the clinical effect of arthroscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of patients with primary frozen shoulder
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20200326-00079
- VernacularTitle:关节镜下粘连松解术治疗原发性冻结肩患者的临床效果分析
- Author:
Bo YUAN
1
;
Yumin LI
;
Shaolong ZHANG
;
Dong MA
Author Information
1. 民航总医院骨科，北京 100123
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2020;47(7):441-445
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic adhesiolysis on patients with primary frozen shoulder and its effect on shoulder joint function.Methods:The clinical data of 54 patients with primary frozen shoulder who visited Civil Aviation General Hospital from March 2017 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different treatment regimens, the patients were divided into a study group and a control group, with 27 patients in each group, there were 11 males and 43 females, aged (47.6±3.4) years, and the age ranged from 41 to 64 years. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional conservative treatment measures, and patients in the study group were treated with loose adhesion under arthroscope on the basis of the control group. The shoulder joint activity (range of motion angles for flexion, abduction and lateral rotation), Constant score, UCLA score and VAS score as well as the complications of the two groups were compared. The measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( Mean± SD), the t test was used for comparison between groups. The count data were expressed as percentage and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Results:In the study group, postoperative anterior flexion, abduction, lateral external rotation were (160.2±20.7)°, (163.6±20.1)°, (50.5±8.9)°, respectively. The patients in the control group experienced (119.5±19.5)° of anterior flexion, (121.2±19.5)° of abduction, (35.6±6.4)° of lateral external rotation. After treatment, the activity of the shoulder joint in the study group was significantly better than that in the control group, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups( P<0.05). In the study group, the postoperative Constant score was (83.1± 9.3) scores, VAS score was (2.8±0.3) scores, UCLA score was (31.7±3.1) scores; in the control group, the postoperative Constant score was (71.7±9.7) scores, VAS score was (4.4±0.3) scores, UCLA score was (22.8±3.6) scores ( P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the Constant score and UCLA score in the study group were significantly higher, and the VAS score was significantly lower, differences were statistically significant( P<0.05). The difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusions:For patients with primary frozen shoulder, arthroscopic adhesiolysis can significantly improve the shoulder function of patients. At the same time, this operation has significant clinical treatment effect, which is conducive to the clinical application and promotion.
