Effect of the interval of radical prostatectomy after prostate puncture on the perioperative period and prognosis of patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20190603-00085
- VernacularTitle:前列腺穿刺术后行前列腺癌根治术的间隔时间对患者围手术期及预后的影响
- Author:
Zhiguo JIANG
1
;
Wei DU
;
Jiacun CHEN
;
Rumin WEN
;
Junqi WANG
Author Information
1. 徐州医科大学 221004
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2020;47(5):321-325
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of the interval of radical prostatectomy after prostate puncture on the perioperative period and prognosis of patients.Methods:Patient’s data from September 2016 to September 2018 whom performed laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were collected and retrospectively analyzed. All prostate biopsy confirmed prostate cancer and 66 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The average age was (70.11 ± 5.01) years, ranged from 60 to 79 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the interval time from prostate biopsy to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: <7 d group ( n=32) and 6-8 weeks group ( n= 34). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, positive rate of incisional margin, postoperative urinary incontinence rate and the rate of urinary incontinence 6 months after operation, rate of postoperative erectile dysfunction and bone metastasis were compared and analyzed between the two groups. When the data conformed to the normal distribution, the data were expressed in Mean±standard deviation ( Mean± SD), and the independent sample t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance between groups. When the data did not conform to the normal distribution, the measurement data was expressed as Median (interquartile range) [ M( P25, P75)], and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison between groups. Count data comparison between groups using Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method. Unconditional multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between outcome and exposure. Results:All the 66 patients successfully underwent surgery, the surgery success rate was 100%. The average operation time of <7 d group and group 6-8 weeks group was [185.00(174.50, 193.50)] min and [183.00(175.00, 187.50) min], respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.685 8, U=512.0). The average intraoperative blood loss of group <7 d group and 6-8 weeks group was [185.50(177.75, 205.25)]ml, [189.00(180.75, 206.00)] ml, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.685 9, U=512.0). The average postoperative hospital stays of <7 d group and 6-8 weeks group was [14.00(11.75, 16.00)] d, [13.50(12.00, 15.00)] d, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.785 7, U=522.5). The positive rate of incisal margin of<7 d group and 6-8 weeks group was 18.75%, 14.71%, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.659 5, χ2=0.194). The postoperative urinary incontinence rate of <7 d group and 6-8 weeks group was 6.25% and 8.82%, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=1.000 0). The urinary control after follow-up for six months of <7 d group and 6-8 weeks group was 6.25% and 2.94%, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.607 7). The postoperative erectile dysfunction rate of<7 d group and group 6-8 weeks group was 9.38% and 8.82%, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=1.000 0). The postoperative bone metastasis rate of group<7 d and 6-8 weeks group was 6.25% and 5.88%, respectively, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=1.000 0). Conclusions:Performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within 7 days following prostate biopsy did not adversely affect the postoperative outcomes and prognosis, also not increased postoperative complications, can shorten the patient′s treatment cycle.
