Clinical observation of decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine in treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.cn115356-20191223-00268
- VernacularTitle:地西他滨联合小剂量阿糖胞苷治疗高危骨髓增生异常综合征临床观察
- Author:
Yujiao CUI
1
;
Xindong ZHAO
;
Shaoling WU
;
Chunying DUAN
;
Haifeng YUAN
;
Qiao SONG
Author Information
1. 青岛大学医学部临床医学系 266071
- From:
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
2020;29(5):279-283
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine in treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.Methods:The data of 47 newly treated MDS patients who had high-risk or above scores according to revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2016 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group (15 cases) and decitabine group (32 cases). The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions in two groups were compared.Results:After 4 courses of treatment, the bone marrow remission rate, partial remission rate and hematologic remission rate was 20.0% (3/15), 6.7% (1/15), and 13.3% (2/15), respectively in decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group, and was 28.1% (9/32), 3.1% (1/32), and 9.4% (3/32), respectively in decitabine group, and there were no statistically differences of both groups (both P > 0.05). The overall response rate in decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group was higher than that in decitabine group [93.3% (14/15) vs. 62.5% (20/32), P = 0.037], and the complete remission rate in decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group was higher than that in decitabine group [53.3% (8/15) vs. 21.9% (7/32), P = 0.046]. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group was 86%; and the median OS time of decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group was 24 months (95% CI 15.5-32.5 months), which was higher than that of decitabine group (20 months), but there was no statistically significant difference ( χ2 = 0.058, P = 0.810). The incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ bone marrow suppression and infection in decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group was higher than that in decitabine group, but there were no statistically significant differences of both groups (both P > 0.05). Grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ bone marrow suppression and infection were commonly found within the first 2 courses of treatment in decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine group, and the adverse reactions gradually decreased in the subsequent treatment. Conclusions:Decitabine combined with low-dose cytarabine can achieve better remission rate and prolong survival time for MDS patients with high-risk and above. There is no significant increase in the incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ bone marrow suppression and infection. For high-risk MDS patients who are not suitable or unable to receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, it can be the preferred option.
