Clinical efficacy evaluation of minimally invasive periodontal therapy assisted by endoscopy
10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.03.005
- Author:
XIA Jiaojiao
1
;
LI Houxuan
2
Author Information
1. 1. Department of Periodontal, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University 2.Department of Periodontal, Suzhou Stomatological Hospital
2. Department of Periodontal, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
periodontitis;
subgingival scaling;
root planning;
periodontal endoscope;
initial periodontal therapy;
probing depth;
bleeding on probing;
attachment loss
- From:
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
2021;29(3):171-177
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective : To investigate the clinical effect of periodontal endoscope-assisted scaling and root planing (SRP) in treating advanced periodontitis.
Methods: Nineteen cases of grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ periodontitis selected from June 2017 to January 2019 in the Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University were divided into the periodontal endoscope and control groups. In the periodontal endoscope group, SRP was performed under a periodontal microscope in one treatment after initial supragingival scaling; in the control group, SRP was performed under regular conditions, and additional SRP was conducted in positive bleeding on probing sites twice every other week as needed. Periodontal status, including probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and attachment loss (AL), was recorded by a Florida probe.
Results: For sites of 40.05). There was no significant difference in the BOP positive rate or AL change between the two groups at 3 months and 6 months (P > 0.05). For sites with PD > 6 mm, at baseline, the positive rates of PD, BOP and AL in the endoscope group were more serious than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant. The PD- and BOP-positive rates and AL in the endoscope group and control group decreased significantly from baseline at 3 and 6 months. However, PD in the endoscope group became shallower than that in the control group (P < 0.05) after 3 and 6 months. There was no significant difference in the BOP positive rate or AL between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion :When compared to regular SRP, periodontal microscope-assisted SRP achieves better improvement in PD and is more beneficial for reducing the BOP and AL of deeper sites.
- Full text:内窥镜辅助下微创牙周基础治疗的临床疗效评价.pdf
