Clinical application of digital technology in repairing of heel wound with peroneal artery perforator propeller flap
10.7507/1002-1892.201908079
- Author:
Wanqiu ZHAO
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese PLA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
digital technology;
heel;
peroneal artery perforator;
Propeller flap;
wound repair
- From:
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
2020;34(3):367-372
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To study the effectiveness of digital technique in repairing of heel wound with peroneal artery perforator propeller flap. Methods: Between March 2016 and March 2019, the heel wounds of 31 patients were repaired with the peroneal artery perforator propeller flaps. There were 21 males and 10 females, with an average age of 36 years (range, 12-53 years). Seventeen patients were admitted to hospital in emergency after trauma, the time from injury to admission was 6.0-12.5 hours, with an average of 8.5 hours; 14 patients were chronic infectious wounds and ulcer. The wound area ranged from 5 cm×4 cm to 12 cm×8 cm. Before flap repair, CT angiography (CTA) data of lower extremity was imported into Mimics19.0 software and three-dimensional reconstruction of peroneal artery perforator and skin model, accurate location of perforator, accurate design of perforator flap, and simulated operation according to the defect range and location were obtained. Results: The origin and course of peroneal artery perforator, the position of perforator, the diameter of perforator, and the maximum length of the naked perforator were determined based on the three-dimensional model. There was no significant difference in locating point of perforator, diameter of perforator, maximum length of naked perforator between the pre- and intra-operative measurements ( P>0.05). The position of the lower perforator of the peroneal artery were on the posterolateral lateral ankle tip (5-10 cm) in 31 cases. The total incidence of perforating branches within 10 cm on the tip of lateral malleolus was 96.9%, and the length of vascular pedicle was (3.44±0.65) cm. The flap removal and transposition in 31 patients were successfully completed. The average operation time was 45 minutes (range, 30-65 minutes). After operation, vein crisis and partial necrosis occurred in 4 cases and 3 cases, respectively, which were survived after symptomatic treatment. All the grafts survived and the incisions healed by first intention. All the patients were followed up 3-18 months, with an average of 12 months. At last follow-up, according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 17 cases were excellent, 11 cases were good, and 3 cases were fair, and the excellent and good rate was 87.5%. Conclusion: The digital technique can improve the accuracy of perforator localization and the design of peroneal artery perforator propeller flap, and reduce the difficulty of operation, and the risk caused by the variation of vascular anatomy.
