Comparative study on six alkaloids in Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata and Aconiti Radix in Jiangyou of Sichuan Province based on multivariate statistical analysis
10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2019.06.031
- Author:
Zheng-Ming YANG
1
Author Information
1. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata;
Aconiti Radix;
Aconitinein;
Activity ratio;
Alkaloids;
Benzoylaconitine;
Benzoylhypaconitine;
Benzoylmesaconitine;
Hypaconitine;
Mesaconitine;
Multivariate statistical analysis;
Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
- From:
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs
2019;50(6):1461-1471
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To establish a UPLC method for the simultaneous determination of benzoylmesaconitine, benzoylaconitine, benzoylhypaconitine, mesaconitine, hypaconitine and aconitinein Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata (ALRP) and Aconiti Radix (AR), and to compare the content difference of six alkaloids in the samples with multivariate statistical analysis. Methods Alkaloids in ALRP and AR were extracted with 0.05 mol/mL hydrochloric acid solution by ultrasonic extraction. The UPLC method was performed on a BEH C18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) through a gradient elution of acetonitrile and water at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/min with column temperature at 35 ℃. The injection volume was set at 4.0 μL, and the detection wavelength was set at 235 nm. Difference significance analysis, activity ratio analysis, toxic constituents index analysis, correlation analysis, hierarchical cluster heatmap analysis, principal component analysis, and TOPSIS analysis were used for data processing to comprehensively evaluate the quality of ALRP and AR. Results The method was in accordance with the regulations. Compared with the content of six alkaloids in ALRP and AR, significant difference existed in mesaconitine, benzoylhypaconitine, aconitine, and monoester diterpenoid alkaloids (MDAs); Significant difference existed in benzoylmesaconitine and benzoylaconitine; There were no significant difference in hypaconitine and diester-diterpenoid alkaloids (DDAs). Taking the six alkaloids as indexes, the sample No. 15 of ALRP was the best in quality and the samples No. 7 of AR was the best in quality. Conclusion The established method is simple, accurate and reliable with good precision, repeatability and stability, which can be used for the simultaneous determination of six alkaloids in ALRP and AR. It is much more accurate and convenient to conduct the quality evaluation by using activity ratio, toxic constituents index and multivariate statistical analysis. The study could provide a reference for improving analysis and determination of ester-type alkaloids in ALRP and AR in ChP, and providing a reference for quality control and evaluation of ALRP and AR.
