The Effects of Bolus Volume and Texture on Pharyngeal Pressure Events Using High-resolution Manometry and Its Comparison with Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study.
- Author:
Ju Seok RYU
1
;
Donghwi PARK
;
Yoongul OH
;
Seok Tae LEE
;
Jin Young KANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Biomechanics; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Manometry; Pressure
- MeSH: Bread; Catheters; Data Collection; Deglutition Disorders; Deglutition*; Drinking; Epiglottis; Manometry*; Prospective Studies; Relaxation; Yogurt
- From:Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2016;22(2):231-239
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to develop new parameters of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and to applicate these to quantify the effect of bolus volume and texture on pharyngeal swallowing. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects prospectively swallowed dry, thin fluid 2 mL, thin fluid 5 mL, thin fluid 10 mL, and drinking twice to compare effects of bolus volume. To compare effect of texture, subjects swallowed thin fluid 5 mL, yogurt 5 mL, and bread twice. A 32-sensor HRM catheter and BioVIEW ANALYSIS software were used for data collection and analysis. HRM data were synchronized with kinematic analysis of videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) using epiglottis tilting. RESULTS: Linear correlation analysis for volume showed significant correlation for area of velopharynx, duration of velopharynx, pre-upper esophageal sphincter (UES) maximal pressure, minimal UES pressure, UES activity time, and nadir UES duration. In the correlation with texture, all parameters were not significantly different. The contraction of the velopharynx was faster than laryngeal elevation. The durations of UES relaxation was shorter in the kinematic analysis than HRM. CONCLUSIONS: The bolus volume was shown to have significant effect on pharyngeal pressure and timing, but the texture did not show any effect on pharyngeal swallowing. The parameters of HRM were more sensitive than those of kinematic analysis. As the parameters of HRM are based on precise anatomic structure and the kinematic analysis reflects the actions of multiple anatomic structures, HRM and VFSS should be used according to their purposes.
