Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Inoperable Primary Lung Cancer.
10.3348/jkrs.2004.51.4.417
- Author:
Seong Hyup KIM
1
;
Gyoo Sik JUNG
;
Seung Ryong LEE
;
Ji Ho KO
;
Man Hong JUNG
;
Sung Dal PARK
;
Bong Gwon CHEON
;
Chang Yeun LEE
;
Kyung Seung OH
;
Young Duk CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Gospel Hospital, College of Medicine, Kosin University, Korea. gsjung@ns.kosinmed.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lung neoplasms;
Lung neoplasms, therapy;
Lung, CT;
Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation
- MeSH:
Anesthesia, Local;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung;
Catheter Ablation*;
Chest Tubes;
Conscious Sedation;
Drainage;
Drug Therapy;
Electrodes;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Lung Neoplasms*;
Lung*;
Necrosis;
Pneumonia;
Pneumothorax;
Radiotherapy;
Sputum;
Tolnaftate;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2004;51(4):417-425
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To present the initial experience of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of inoperable primary lung cancer, and to assess the technical feasibility and potential complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with inoperable lung cancer underwent percutaneous RFA. Nineteen of 20 patients had stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer, and the remaining one had stage I lung cancer with pulmonary dysfunction. The mean tumor size was 4.6+/-0.4 cm (range, 1.8-8.4 cm). RFA was performed with a single (n=18) or cluster (n=2) cool-tip RF electrode and a generator under CT guidance using local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Twenty tumors were treated in 28 sessions. Patients were assessed by contrast-enhanced CT in all cases at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Eleven patients received chemotherapy (n=10) or radiotherapy (n=1) after RFA. RESULTS: RFA was technically successful and well tolerated in all patients. Complete necrosis was attained in 7 lesions (35%), near complete (90-99%) necrosis in 10 lesions (50%), and partial (50-89%) necrosis in 3 lesions (15%). During the mean follow up of 202 days (21 to 481 days), tumor size was decreased in 13 patients, unchanged in 3, and increased in 4. In the latter four, additional RFA was performed. One patient underwent surgery three months after RFA and the histopathologic findings showed a large cavity with thin fibrotic wall suggestive of complete necrosis. During or after the procedure, pneumothorax (n=10), moderate pain (n=4), blood tinged sputum (n=2), and pneumonia (n=2) were developed. Chest tube drainage was required in only 1 patient due to severe pneumothorax. Other patients were managed conservatively. Seven patients died at 61 to 398 days (mean, 230 days) after RFA. The remaining 13 patients were alive 21 to 481 days (mean, 187 days) after RFA. CONCLUSION: RFA appears to be a technically feasible and relatively safe procedure for the cytoreductive treatment of inoperable, non-small cell lung cancer and warrants further investigation as a complementary treatment to chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
