Prediction of the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses According to the Ultrasonographic Morphologic Scoring System and Doppler Velocity Wave Form.
- Author:
Jung Han LEE
;
Sam Hyun CHO
;
Hyang MOON
;
Youn Yeoung HWANG
;
Kyung Tal KIM
;
Ji Soo PARK
;
Jung Bae YOO
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Transvaginal sonography;
Ovarian tumor;
Morphologic scoring system;
Pulsatility index;
Resistance index
- MeSH:
Diagnosis*;
Female;
Humans;
Rheology;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Ultrasonography
- From:Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy
1999;10(3):264-271
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative usefulness of the morphologic scoring system and spectral doppler ultrasonographic analysis in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. METHODS: All patients scanned between July 1995 and June 1998 with sonographically identified and pathologically confirmed adnexal masses formed the study group. The adnexal masses were scored as benign or malignant on the basis of their sonographic appearance. Specific categories included inner wall structure, wall thickness, septal structure, and echogenicity. Women whose morphologic findings were suspicious for malignancy underwent doppler sonography. A threshold pulsatility index of 1.0 and resistance index of 0.4 were used to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. The findings were correlated with the presence of malignancy. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty one patients formed the study group; 215 patients were benign and 36 patients were malignant pathologically. Using the morphologic scoring system, 31 of the 36 malignant masses were classified as suggestive of malignant tumor, and 147 of the 215 benign masses were classified as not suggestive of malignant tumor (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 68%; positive predictive value, 31%; negative predictive value, 97%). Doppler velocimetry was performed on a total of 62 patients, 19 patients with malignant tumors and 43 patients with benign tumors. A mean PI value of 0.85 and RI value of 0.52 for malignant tumors and mean PI value of 2.00 and RI value of 0.75 for benign tumors was shown. The PI value was significantly lower (p 0.001) in malignant than that of in benign masses, but RI value was not significant (p 0.184). The sensitivity and specificity in the detection of malignancy combined with doppler velocimetry was 86% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Doppler velocimetry studies did not add substantially to the prediction of malignancy using the morphologic scoring system.
