Advantages of individualized open wedge high tibial osteotomy in treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis
10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2803
- Author:
Yinghao YU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Wuxi People’s Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Genu varus;
Individualized;
Knee joint;
Lower limb alignment;
Medial compartment;
Open wedge high tibial osteotomy;
Orthopedics;
Osteoarthritis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2020;24(27):4310-4316
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Open wedge high tibial osteotomy can achieve significant clinical efficacy for patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and genu varus. However, Fujisawa point has been recognized as a reference for the correction of lower limb alignment. Can individualized orthopedics in lower limb alignment obtain better clinical efficacy? OBJECTIVE: To explore short-term efficacy of individualized orthopedics in lower limb alignment for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis through open wedge high tibial osteotomy. METHODS: Totally 46 patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis treated by open wedge high tibial osteotomy from June 2016 to May 2018 in Department of Orthopedics, Wuxi People's Hospital were enrolled in this study. X-ray and MRI were used to evaluate the knee and I-III degeneration grades were classified. Patients at Grade I and II were randomly divided into individualized orthopedics group and control group with 16 cases in each group. Patients at grade III were classified as Fujisawa group with 14 cases. In the individualized orthopedics group, mild grade I and moderate grade II respectively corrected lower limb alignment to 50% and 55% of lateral tibial plateau, while control group and Fujisawa group all corrected the alignment to 62.5% point. Postoperative lower limb alignment, pre- and post-operative range of motion, femoral-tibial angle and medial proximal tibial angle of the knee were measured and evaluated. The hospital for special surgery score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index score were followed up before operation, 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, while postoperative self-satisfaction of patients was also compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) All patients were followed up for 12 months. (2) Three groups achieved satisfactory lower limb alignment. Range of motion and medial proximal tibial angle increased and femoral-tibial angle decreased at postoperative stage (P < 0.05). (3) Over time, hospital for special surgery scores increased and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index scores decreased statistically in three groups (P < 0.05). Compared to control group, hospital for special surgery scores of the individualized orthopedics group were improved 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), while Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index scores of the individualized orthopedics group decreased significantly 3 and 6 months after operation (P < 0.05). There were no obvious differences in hospital for special surgery and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index scores at 12 months between the control and individualized orthopedics groups (P > 0.05). (4) All patients were satisfied with the surgical efficacy. Postoperative self-satisfaction scores of individualized orthopedics group were superior to that of control group (P < 0.05). (5) According to the results, individualized open wedge high tibial osteotomy is benefit to obtain early functional rehabilitation of the knee through accurate correction of lower limb alignment. It can also improve patient satisfaction.
