Effect of Electroacupuncture on Pain Reaction and Content of Proteinase-activated Receptors 2 in Dorsal Root Ganglion in Hyperalgesia Rats
10.13702/j.1000-0607.170302
- Author:
Hai-Yu HU
1
Author Information
1. Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Electroacupuncture;
Hyperalgesic priming;
Inflammatory pain;
Lumbar dorsal root ganglia;
Pain transformation;
Proteinase-activated receptors 2
- From:
Acupuncture Research
2018;43(1):14-19
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on mechanical hyperalgesia threshold (MHTs) and thermal hyperalgesia threshold (THTs) and content of proteinase-activated receptors 2 (PAR 2) in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in rats with inflammatory pain, so as to explore its peripheral mechanism underlying improvement of inflammatory pain. METHODS: The present study contains two parts. 1) In the first part, 27 male SD rats were randomized into sham hyperalgesic priming (sham-HP) group and real hyperalgesic priming (HP) group (n＝5 in the sham-HP group and n＝6 in the HP group for the test of MHTs, n＝8 in the two groups for the test of THTs). The sham-HP model was established by subcutaneous injection of normal saline into the left plantar part of the hind-paw, and the HP model established by subcutaneous injection of 1% carragenan (the first injection) into the same left hind paw, followed by injection of PGE2 (100 ng/25 μL, the second injection) into the dorsum pedis of the same hind paw 7 days after the first injection. The ipsilateral paw withdrawal latencies (MHTs and THTs) were detected before and 5 h, 3 d and 6 d after the first injection, 0.5, 4 and 24 h after the second injection. 2) In the second part, 64 male SD rats were randomly divided into sham-HP, HP, sham-EA and EA groups (n＝16 in each group). The sham-HP and HP models were made in the same way as the first part. Both"Zusanli"(ST 36)and "Kunlun"(BL 60) were punctured with filiform needles in the sham-EA group and also stimulated with EA: 2 Hz/100 Hz, 0.5－1.5 mA (0.5 mA increase per 10 min) for 30 min in the EA group, 1 time/d for 7 d. Both ipsilateral MHTs and THTs were observed at the same time-points of the first part and the PAR 2 protein content in the L 4－L 6 DRGs was assayed by ELISA 24 h after the second injection. RESULTS: 1) In the first part of the study, compared with the sham-HP group, the MHTs at 5 h and 3 d, and THT at 5 h after the first injection, and MHTs, and THTs at 4 and 24 h after the se-cond injection were significantly decreased in the HP group (P<0.01, P<0.05). 2) In the second part of the study, compared with the HP group, the MHTs at 4 and 24 h after the second injection and the THTs at 3 d after the first injection, 4 and 24 h after the second injection were significantly up-regulated in the EA group (P<0.01, P<0.05). The content of PAR 2 in the DRGs (L 4－L 6) was significantly higher in the HP group than in the sham-HP group (P<0.05), but considerably lower in the EA group than in the HP group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: EA can suppress hyperalgesia priming in inflammatory pain rats which may be related to its effect in down-regulating PAR 2 level in the lumbar DRGs.
