Relationship between Work Hours and Smoking Behaviors in Korean Male Wage Workers.
- Author:
Sung Mi JANG
1
;
Eun Hee HA
;
Hyesook PARK
;
Eunjeong KIM
;
Kyunghee JUNG-CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. jungchoikh@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Work hours;
Working hours;
Smoking;
Precarious employment;
Job satisfaction
- MeSH:
Employment;
Humans;
Job Satisfaction;
Male*;
Prevalence;
Salaries and Fringe Benefits*;
Smoke*;
Smoking Cessation;
Smoking*;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2013;25(1):35-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study are 1) to measure the prevalence of smoking according to weekly work hours by using data from the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS), and 2) to explain the cause of high smoking prevalence among those with short or long work hours by relative explanatory fraction. METHODS: Data from a total of 2,044 male subjects who responded to the questionnaire in the 10th year (2007) and 11th year (2008) of the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study were used for analysis. Current smoking, smoking cessation, continuous smoking, start of smoking, weekly work hours, occupational characteristics, sociodemographic and work-related factors, and health behavior-related variables were analyzed. Log-binomial regression analysis was used to study the relationship between weekly work hours and smoking behaviors in terms of the prevalence ratio. RESULTS: The 2008 age-adjusted smoking prevalence was 64.9% in the short work hours group, 54.7% in the reference work hours group, and 60.6% in the long work hours group. The smoking prevalence of the short work hours group was 1.39 times higher than that of the reference work hours group (95% confidence interval of 1.17-1.65), and this was explained by demographic variables and occupational characteristics. The smoking prevalence of the long work hours group was 1.11 times higher than that of the reference work hours group when the age was standardized (95% confidence interval of 1.03-1.19). This was explained by demographic variables. No independent effects of short or long work hours were found when the variables were adjusted. CONCLUSION: Any intervention program to decrease the smoking prevalence in the short work hours group must take into account employment type, job satisfaction, and work-related factors.
