A study of clinically relevant initial loading dose of propofol during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using sedation with propofol.
- Author:
Dong Ryeol CHAE
1
;
Ho Dong KIM
;
Jong Hyo LEE
;
Sang Pil KIM
;
Weon Jeong JEON
;
Soo Hyun KIM
;
Yung Sang OH
;
Kyu Hyun LEE
;
Yeol BAE
;
Jang Hyun CHO
;
Do Hyun KIM
;
Jun Yeong LIM
;
Hyung Yun LIM
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, St. Carollo Hospital, Sunchon, Korea. namii@kornet.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Propofol;
EGD;
Sedation;
Loading dose
- MeSH:
Anoxia;
Arterial Pressure;
Endoscopy, Digestive System;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal*;
Heart Rate;
Heart Ventricles;
Humans;
Hypotension;
Oxygen;
Propofol*;
Respiratory Rate
- From:Korean Journal of Medicine
2005;68(3):261-267
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Sedation with propofol during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been increased. However, the use of propofol during EGD may have significant side effects such as hypoxemia and hypotension. We studied the dose of propofol for adequate sedation without side effects during EGD. METHODS: From June to August 2003, 46 healthy persons who visited St. Carollo hospital health management center for diagnostic EGD were enrolled for this study. Twenty four persons (Group A) were given a initial loading dose of propofol 60 mg (in person below 60 kg by body weight) and 80 mg (in person above 60 kg by body weight). Twenty two persons (Group B) were given a initial loading dose of propofol 80 mg and 100 mg at the same way. Additional dose of propofol which was injected once a minute until adequate sedation by 20 mg and maintenance dose during EGD were compared between two groups. Respiration rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and ejection fraction of left ventricle were monitored. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between two groups in monitored parameters. Persons in group B were given significantly lower additional dose (p<0.001) and maintenance dose (p<0.05) of propofol. However total amount of propofol during EGD was not significantly different between two groups. CONCLUSION: In relatively young (under 60 years of age) and healthy persons without significant medical problem, 80 mg and 100 mg of propofol (in person below 60 kg and above 60 kg by body weight) as initial loading dose of propofol during EGD are more clinically relevant than 60 mg and 80 mg of propofol (in person below 60 kg and above 60 kg by body weight).
