Ultrasound diagnosis and differential diagnosis of renal arteriovenous fistula
- Author:
Jian-Quan ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ultrasonics
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arteriovenous fistula;
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound;
Kidney diseases;
Spectrum analysis;
Three-dimensional ultrasound;
Ultrasonography, Doppler, color
- From:
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
2010;28(8):878-883
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To summarize the ultrasound features of renal arteriovenous fistula (RAVF) under various ultrasound imaging modes, so as to avoid missed diagnosis of RAVF on initial ultrasound examination. Methods: The clinical data of 6 patients with RAVF, including the ultrasound evidence, the timing of ultrasound diagnosis, the modes of ultrasound diagnosis, and the agreement between ultrasound diagnosis and selective renal arterial angiography, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: 2D ultrasound had 1 case of correct diagnosis, 1 case of misdiagnosis and 4 cases of missed diagnosis. Color Doppler and spectral Doppler both had all the 6 cases correctly diagnosed. Ultrasound angiography in 3 cases demonstrated that the contrast agent reached the renal veins earlier than reached the renal parenchyma; large fistula lumen was associated with ischemia of downstream areas. 3D ultrasound vividly reflected the structure of fistula lumen volume, and provided us with the profiles of blood signal in fistula at different planes and angles, improving our knowledge of blood flow on the fistula. Conclusion: Ultrasound is the first line screening method for RAVF. Color Doppler plays a decisive role in the diagnosis of RAVF and pulsed spectral Doppler plays a synergetic role and contributes to differential diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may help to discover the abnormality of venous circulation and the ischemic parenchyma area due to shunting. 2D ultrasound has a poor diagnostic value and is liable to lead to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
