Comparison of Root Images between Post-Myelographic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Lumbar Radiculopathy.
10.3340/jkns.2016.0809.008
- Author:
Chun Kun PARK
1
;
Hong Jae LEE
;
Kyeong Sik RYU
Author Information
1. Good Doctor Teun Teun Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Radiculopathy;
Myelography;
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MeSH:
Constriction, Pathologic;
Electromyography;
Humans;
Leg;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*;
Myelography;
Pain Measurement;
Pathology;
Radiculopathy*;
Spine;
Visual Analog Scale
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2017;60(5):540-549
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography-myelography (CTM) compared to that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: The study included 91 patients presenting with radicular leg pain caused by herniated nucleus pulposus or lateral recess stenosis in the lumbar spine. The degree of nerve root compression on MRI and CTM was classified into four grades. The results of each imaging modality as assessed by two different observers were compared. Visual analog scale score for pain and electromyography result were the clinical parameters used to evaluate the relationships between clinical features and nerve root compression grades on both MRI and CTM. These relationships were quantified by calculating the receiver-operating characteristic curves, and the degree of relationship was compared between MRI and CTM. RESULTS: McNemar's test revealed that the two diagnostic modalities did not show diagnostic concurrence (p<0.0001). Electromyography results did not correlate with grades on either MRI or CTM. The visual analog pain scale score results were correlated better with changes of the grades on CTM than those on MRI (p=0.0007). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that CTM could better define the pathology of degenerative lumbar spine diseases with radiculopathy than MRI. CTM can be considered as a useful confirmative diagnostic tool when the exact cause of radicular pain in a patient with lumbar radiculopathy cannot be identified by using MRI. However, the invasiveness and potential complications of CTM are still considered to be pending questions to settle.
