A Lower T1 Slope as a Predictor of Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages.
10.3340/jkns.2017.0404.001
- Author:
Su Hun LEE
1
;
Jun Seok LEE
;
Soon Ki SUNG
;
Dong Wuk SON
;
Sang Weon LEE
;
Geun Sung SONG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea. md6576@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cervical vertebrae;
Postural balance;
Spinal fusion;
Prosthesis failure;
Risk assessment
- MeSH:
Cervical Vertebrae;
Diskectomy*;
Female;
Humans;
Kyphosis;
Laminoplasty;
Logistic Models;
Neck Muscles;
Postural Balance;
Prosthesis Failure;
Pseudarthrosis;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Assessment;
Risk Factors;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Spinal Fusion;
Surgeons
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2017;60(5):567-576
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Preoperative parameters including the T1 slope (T1S) and C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) have been recognized as predictors of kyphosis after laminoplasty, which is accompanied by posterior neck muscle damage. The importance of preoperative parameters has been under-estimated in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) because there is no posterior neck muscle damage. We aimed to determine whether postoperative subsidence and pseudarthrosis could be predicted according to specific parameters on preoperative plain radiographs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients (male: female, 22: 19; mean age, 51.15±9.25 years) who underwent ACDF with a stand-alone polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage (>1 year follow-up). Parameters including SVA, T1S, segmental angle and range of motion (ROM), C2–C7 cervical angle and ROM, and segmental inter-spinous distance were measured on preoperative plain radiographs. Risk factors of subsidence and pseudarthrosis were determined using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty-five segments (27 single-segment and 14 two-segment fusions) were included. The subsidence and pseudarthrosis rates based on the number of segments were 36.4% and 29.1%, respectively. Demographic data and fusion level were unrelated to subsidence. A greater T1S was associated with a lower risk of subsidence (p=0.017, odds ratio=0.206). A cutoff value of T1S<28° significantly predicted subsidence (sensitivity: 70%, specificity: 68.6%). There were no preoperative predictors of pseudarthrosis except old age. CONCLUSION: A lower T1S (T1S<28°) could be a risk factor of subsidence following ACDF. Surgeons need to be aware of this risk factor and should consider various supportive procedures to reduce the subsidence rates for such cases.
