Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension using a 5 F microtube-irrigated ablation catheter
10.16781/j.0258-879x.2019.11.1263
- Author:
Hong ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiology, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hypertension;
Irrigated ablation catheter;
Renal denervation;
Renal sympathetic denervation
- From:
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
2019;40(11):1263-1269
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To observe the effectiveness of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) for reducing blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension using a 5 F microtube-irrigated ablation catheter. Methods: Thirty patients with resistant hypertension received RDN between January 2013 and December 2015. They were randomly divided into two groups: general ablation catheter group and microtube-irrigated ablation catheter group, with 15 cases in each group. 5 F temperature-controlled catheter was used in the general ablation catheter group. 5 F microtube-irrigated ablation catheter (microtubes at the head) was used in the microtube-irrigated ablation catheter group. Cold saline was irrigated for mapping and ablation. All patients were followed up for 9 months. Clinic blood pressure, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, biochemical tests and cardiac function were measured at baseline and during follow-up. Results: RDN was successfully performed in all patients. At the 9-month follow-up, the decrease of 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the microtube-irrigated ablation catheter group was more obvious than that in the general ablation catheter group ([34.67±13.02] mmHg vs [17.00 ± 16.74] mmHg, P<0.01; 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the microtube-irrigated ablation catheter group was significantly lower than that in the general ablation catheter group ([81.20 ± 7.15] mmHg vs (87.60 ± 8.17) mmHg, P<0.05). There was a decreased trend in the use of antihypertensive drugs in the microtube-irrigated ablation catheter group as compared with the general ablation catheter group, particularly in the use of diuretics (P<0.05). During the operation, the microtube-irrigated ablation catheter group had a significantly lower catheter temperature (P<0.001), greater energy (P<0.05), and greater decrease in impedance than the general ablation catheter group (P<0.05). No syncope or amaurosis caused by hypotension, or deterioration of renal function occurred in either group. Conclusion: 5 F microtube-irrigated ablation catheter is a safe and effective device during renal artery ablation. It has more advantages than general ablation catheter in reducing SBP and diuretic use in the treatment of resistant hypertension.
