Correlation between spinopelvic sagittal parameters and adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion
10.16781/j.0258-879x.2019.04.0377
- Author:
Jia-Bin YUAN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Spine Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University)
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Adjacent segment disease;
Case-control studies;
Lumbar fusion;
Spinopelvic parameters
- From:
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
2019;40(4):377-380
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the correlation between adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after lumbar fusion and spinopelvic sagittal parameters, and to explore the risk factors. Methods From Jan. 2013 to Oct. 2017, the patients undergoing revision surgery for ASDis after lumbar fusion in Changhai Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) were enrolled as ASDis group, and the patients who did not have ASDis after lumbar fusion during the same follow-up period were taken as controls. The clinical data of the patients in the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. The differences of the general data (age, gender, body mass index [BMI], follow-up time and the etiology of the first operation) and the spinopelvic sagittal parameters (thoracic kyphosis [TK], sagittal vertical axis [SVA], lumbar lordosis [LL], segmental lumbar lordosis [sLL], pelvic incidence [PI], pelvic tilt [PT] and sacral slope [SS]) were compared between the two groups. Results There were 25 patients in the ASDis group and 50 patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, BMI, follow-up time or the etiology of the first operation between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the LL, sLL and SS were significantly lower in the ASDis group (36.00°±5.44°vs 43.88°±10.62°, 17.80°±5.79°vs 27.62°±6.74°, 27.50°±5.30°vs 31.06°±7.48° all P<0.05), while the PT was significantly greater (26.12°±8.24°vs 18.80°±7.67°, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in the TK or PI between the two groups (both P>0.05). Meantime, the proportion of patients with SVA>50 mm, the difference of PT and LL (PT-LL)=10°, and the ratio of sLL to LL (RL)<60% were significantly higher in the ASDis group than those in the control group (18/25 vs 21/50, 16/25 vs 11/50, 21/25 vs 17/50; all P<0.05). Conclusion The sagittal imbalance after lumbar fusion is closely associated with ASDis, and compensatory kyphosis of adjacent lumbar segments due to surgical segmental lordosis may be one of the causes of ASDis after lumbar fusion.
