Determination of recovery rate of levofloxacin microdialysis probe by high-performance liquid chromatography
10.16781/j.0258-879x.2020.01.0110
- Author:
Xiao-Jian XU
1
Author Information
1. School of Pharmacy, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
High-performance liquid chromatography;
Jugular vein;
Microdialysis;
Prostate;
Relative recovery
- From:
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
2020;41(1):110-114
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the in vitro and in vivo relative recovery rates of levofloxacin from microdialysis probes. Methods High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was established for determination of levofloxacin concentrations. Column was Kromasil C18 (150 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm), the mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and 10 mmol/L of potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution (15:85), with column temperature being 30 °C, detection wavelength being 294 nm, and injection volume being 10 μL. The relative recovery rates of vascular microdialysis probes in vitro were measured by dialysis and reverse dialysis. The effects of drug concentration and flow rate on probe deliveries were investigated. The in vivo recovery rates of the probe in the jugular vein and prostate were measured by reverse dialysis, and the stability of 12 h recovery rate in vivo was investigated. Results When the concentration of levofloxacin was 0.1-50.0 μg/mL, the linear relationship was good in the HPLC analysis (r = 0.998 7), and its specificity was good. The precision and accuracy of high-, medium-, low-concentration quality control samples, and lower limit of quantitation all met the analysis requirements. In the in vitro relative recovery experiments, there was no statistical difference between the recovery rate and reverse recovery rate of the vascular microdialysis probes (P>0.05). Drug concentrations did not affect in vitro recovery rate. The recovery rate decreased with the increase of flow rate. In vivo, the relative recovery rate of the probe was (48.46±1.94)% in the jugular vein and (13.23±1.44)% in the prostate. The relative recovery rates were stable during 12 h. Conclusion The established HPLC can be used for the determination of levofloxacin microdialysis probe. Reverse dialysis can be used to detect the relative recovery rate of levofloxacin microdialysis probe in vivo.
