Tracking evaluation of "General Provisions of Safety and Health for Writing Boards"
10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.11.032
- VernacularTitle:《书写板安全卫生要求》标准应用跟踪评价
- Author:
ZHAO Jinhui, GUO Xin, QIN Ran, LIU Jindong, ZHANG Fengyun, GAO Xian, HUA Weiyu, YU Dehe
1
Author Information
1. Institute of School Health, Beijing Centers for Disease Prevention and Control/Beijing Centers for Disease Preventive Medical Research, Beijing (100013), China
- Publication Type:期刊文章
- Keywords:
Health;
Referencestandards;
Students;
Health personnel
- From:
Chinese Journal of School Health
2020;41(11):1719-1722
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluated the application of General Provisions of Safety and Health for Writing Boards(GB 28231-2011), and to provide basis for the revision and improvement of the standard.
Methods:From June to October 2018, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 852 people engaged in the evaluation, use and production of writing boards in 8 districts of Beijing, Liaoning and Jiangsu. The contents of the survey include the awareness, implementation of the standard and evaluating the use of various parameters in the standard by personnel from different institutions.
Results:The overall awareness ratio of the standard among staffs from health, education and enter prise was 78.26%. For the nominal size of the writing board and the vertical distance between the lower edge and the platform, the reasonableness considered lower by health professionals(62.50%, 37.50%) than that of education professionals(90.00%, 90.00%) and enterprise staffs(90.00%, 90.00%)(P<0.05); For the frequency and reasonableness of the nine parameters such as gloss and adhesion, the perception of each institution were significantly different(P<0.05), with proportion of professionals in health lower than experts in education and enterprise. For the two parameters of color and light resistance, each institution considered the maneuverability was not strong(P>0.05).
Conclusion:Propagation and implement is still needed to strengthen comprehension, because different institutions have different understandings towards the standard. There are still some problems waiting to be solved, such as different standard limits, poor enforceability of two parameters which are writing board color and light resistance.
