Clinical Implications of VEGF and p53 Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Treated with Radiation Therapy.
- Author:
Jin Oh KANG
1
;
Seong Eon HONG
;
Dong Wook KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. kangjino@khmc.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Vascular endothelial growth factor;
p53 proteins;
Cervix neoplasm;
Radiotherapy
- MeSH:
Animals;
Antibodies;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell*;
Cervix Uteri*;
Female;
Humans;
Korea;
Lymph Nodes;
Mice;
Paraffin;
Prognosis;
Radiotherapy;
Sample Size;
Survival Rate;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A*
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment
2003;35(5):440-444
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The present study was designed to analyze the relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and p53, and their impact on clinical outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This immunohistochemical study involved 23 patients with available paraffin blocks among 46 patients who were treated during the period from 1994 to 1997 in Eulji University Hospital in Korea. Anti-VEGF mouse monoclonal antibody and DO-7 anti- p53 mouse monoclonal antibody were used as the primary antibodies. Antibody binding was detected with a LSAB kit. Staining was defined as positive for VEGF and p53, when more than 10% and 5% of the tumor cells were stained out of 500 cells counted, respectively. RESULTS: FIGO stage (p=0.05) and tumor size (p=0.04) were significant prognostic factors for survival. p53 expression was present in 17 (77%) cases. There was no significant relationship between p53 staining and the clinicopathologic factors, such as FIGO stage (p=0.98), tumor size (p=0.43), lymph node status (p=0.82), parametrial invasion (p=0.96), and age (p=0.18). The five year survival rates according to the p53 expression status were 80% for the p53 negative group and 66% for the p53 positive group (p=0.58). Positive VEGF expression was observed in 11 (47%) of the total of 23 patients. Statistical evaluation of VEGF expression according to stage (p=0.36), tumor size(p=0.11), lymph node status (p=0.82), parametrial invasion (p=0.49), and age (p=0.55) revealed no significant difference in any of these parameters. The five year survival rates according to the VEGF expression status were 89% for the VEGF negative group and 41% for the VEGF positive group (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: We suggest that VEGF expression may have an effect on the prognosis of cervix cancer patients treated with radiation therapy, and further evaluation with a large sample size is warranted.
