Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?
10.1016/j.afos.2020.07.002
- Author:
Maroun RIZKALLAH
1
;
Falah BACHOUR
;
Mirvat el KHOURY
;
Amer SEBAALY
;
Boutros FINIANOS
;
Rawad el HAGE
;
Ghassan MAALOUF
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellevue Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
2020;6(3):146-150
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objectives:Hip fragility fractures were regarded as one of the most severe, but recent papers report on the underestimated burden of vertebral compression fractures. This study aims to compare morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures in patients treated in the same setting.
Methods:Patients aged 50 years with hip fracture, and those with vertebral fracture presenting to our hospital between January 2014 and January 2017 were included. Patients were evaluated 1 year after their index fracture. SF-36 scores, mortality, and institutionalization are then recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: hip fractures and vertebral fractures.
Results:There were 106 and 90 patients respectively evaluated in hip and vertebral fracture groups at 1 year. Patients in both groups were comparable for age, sex, comorbidities and neuropsychiatric condition (P > 0.05). At 1 year follow-up, SF-36 showed better averages in all 8 scales in hip fracture group compared to vertebral fracture group. Mortality in the hip fracture group reached 32.1% compared to 10% for the vertebral fracture group (P < 0.01). Fifteen patients were institutionalized in the hip fracture group compared to 18 patients in the vertebral fracture group (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:When comparing patients treated in the same setting, hip fracture is associated with significantly increased mortality than vertebral fracture; however, the latter is associated with more morbidity.
