Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography in Patients Visiting Emergency Department with Overt Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.541
- Author:
Jihang KIM
1
;
Young Hoon KIM
;
Kyoung Ho LEE
;
Yoon Jin LEE
;
Ji Hoon PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seongnam 436-707, Korea. yhkrad@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computed tomography angiography;
Overt gastrointestinal bleeding;
Diagnostic performance
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Angiography/*methods;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Female;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis/*radiography;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Retrospective Studies;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2015;16(3):541-549
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in identifying the cause of bleeding and to determine the clinical features associated with a positive test result of CTA in patients visiting emergency department with overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 111 consecutive patients (61 men and 50 women; mean age: 63.4 years; range: 28-89 years) who visited emergency department with overt GI bleeding. They underwent CTA as a first-line diagnostic modality from July through December 2010. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the CTA images and determined the presence of any definite or potential bleeding focus by consensus. An independent assessor determined the cause of bleeding based on other diagnostic studies and/or clinical follow-up. The diagnostic performance of CTA and clinical characteristics associated with positive CTA results were analyzed. RESULTS: To identify a definite or potential bleeding focus, the diagnostic yield of CTA was 61.3% (68 of 111). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were 84.8% (67 of 79), 96.9% (31 of 32), 98.5% (67 of 68), and 72.1% (31 of 43), respectively. Positive CTA results were associated with the presence of massive bleeding (p = 0.001, odds ratio: 11.506). CONCLUSION: Computed tomography angiography as a first-line diagnostic modality in patients presenting with overt GI bleeding showed a fairly high accuracy. It could identify definite or potential bleeding focus with a moderate diagnostic yield and a high PPV. CTA is particularly useful in patients with massive bleeding.
