Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel® ) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain
- Author:
Masoud HASHEMI
1
;
Payman DADKHAH
;
Mehrdad TAHERI
;
Pegah KATIBEH
;
Saman ASADI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:The Korean Journal of Pain 2020;33(1):66-72
- CountryRepublic of Korea
-
Abstract:
Background:Low back pain secondary to discopathy is a common pain disorder.Multiple minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have been proposed; however, to date no study has compared percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) with intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel® ). We are introducing the first study on patient-reported outcomes of DiscoGel® vs. PLDD for radiculopathy.
Methods:Seventy-two patients were randomly selected from either a previous strategy of PLDD or DiscoGel® , which had been performed in our center during 2016-2017. Participants were asked about their numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and progression to secondary treatment.
Results:The mean NRS scores in the total cohort before intervention was 8.0, and was reduced to 4.3 in the DiscoGel® group and 4.2 in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. The mean ODI score before intervention was 81.25% which was reduced to 41.14% in the DiscoGel® group and 52.86% in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. Between-group comparison of NRS scores after two follow-ups were not statistically different (P = 0.62) but the ODI score in DiscoGel® was statistically lower (P = 0.001). Six cases (16.67%) from each group reported undergoing surgery after the follow-up period which was not statistically different.
Conclusions:Both techniques were equivalent in pain reduction but DiscoGel®had a greater effect on decreasing disability after 12 months, although the rate of progression to secondary treatments and/or surgery was almost equal in the two groups.
