Comparison of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients withacute myocardial infarction according to the use of emergency medical serviceduring one-year clinical follow-up
- Author:
Su Jin KIM
1
;
Eun Sook LEE
;
Myung Ho JEONG
;
Min Chul KIM
;
Doo Sun SIM
;
Young Joon HONG
;
Ju Han KIM
;
Youngkeun AHN
;
Myeong Chan CHO
;
Chong Jin KIM
;
Young Jo KIM
Author Information
1. The Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2020;31(2):181-190
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Objective:The emergency medical service (EMS) is expected to improve the prognosis of patients suffering from acutemyocardial infarction (AMI). We investigated the impact of utilizing EMS on the clinical outcomes of AMI patients.
Methods:From November 2011 to November 2015, a total of 13,102 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial InfarctionRegistry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: the EMSgroup, first medical contact (FMC) with 119; the non-EMS group, the FMC at local hospitals that were not available forpercutaneous coronary intervention. The authors analyzed the mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascularevents during one-year of clinical follow-up.
Results:A total of 8,863 patients were finally analyzed for this study, and a total of 1,999 patients (22.6%) utilized theEMS as FMC. The patients utilizing EMS were more frequently diagnosed with ST-segment elevation AMI. At presentation,the EMS group had a higher incidence of Killip class IV, and they had a shorter symptom-to-door time than non-EMS group. The patients utilizing EMS had higher incidence of peri-procedural complications and in-hospital mortality.The multivariate logistic regression analysis with backward elimination revealed that utilizing EMS is an independent factorfor predicting lower one-year mortality.
Conclusion:This study has demonstrated that the high-risk AMI patients can utilize the EMS in Korea. The EMS grouphas more favorable clinical outcome during one-year follow-up after discharge than the non-EMS group, whereas it had ahigher rate of death during hospitalization compared with that of the non-EMS group.
