Mortality Prediction from Hospital-Acquired Infections in Trauma Patients Using an Unbalanced Dataset
10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.284
- Author:
Mehrdad KARAJIZADEH
1
;
Mahdi NASIRI
;
Mahnaz YADOLLAHI
;
Amir Hussain ZOLFAGHARI
;
Ali PAKDAM
Author Information
1. School of Management & Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Healthcare Informatics Research
2020;26(4):284-294
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objectives:Machine learning has been widely used to predict diseases, and it is used to derive impressive knowledge in the healthcare domain. Our objective was to predict in-hospital mortality from hospital-acquired infections in trauma patients on an unbalanced dataset.
Methods:Our study was a cross-sectional analysis on trauma patients with hospital-acquired infections who were admitted to Shiraz Trauma Hospital from March 20, 2017, to March 21, 2018. The study data was obtained from the surveillance hospital infection database. The data included sex, age, mechanism of injury, body region injured, severity score, type of intervention, infection day after admission, and microorganism causes of infections. We developed our mortality prediction model by random under-sampling, random over-sampling, clustering (k-mean)-C5.0, SMOTE-C5.0, ADASYN-C5.5, SMOTE-SVM, ADASYN-SVM, SMOTE-ANN, and ADASYN-ANN among hospital-acquired infections in trauma patients. All mortality predictions were conducted by IBM SPSS Modeler 18.
Results:We studied 549 individuals with hospital-acquired infections in a trauma hospital in Shiraz during 2017 and 2018. Prediction accuracy before balancing of the dataset was 86.16%. In contrast, the prediction accuracy for the balanced dataset achieved by random under-sampling, random over-sampling, clustering (k-mean)-C5.0, SMOTE-C5.0, ADASYN-C5.5, and SMOTE-SVM was 70.69%, 94.74%, 93.02%, 93.66%, 90.93%, and 100%, respectively.
Conclusions:Our findings demonstrate that cleaning an unbalanced dataset increases the accuracy of the classification model. Also, predicting mortality by a clustered under-sampling approach was more precise in comparison to random under-sampling and random over-sampling methods.
