Association of trainee involvement in an acute pain service with postoperative opioid use in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Author:
Engy T. SAID
1
;
Jacklynn F. SZTAIN
;
Erin I. MARTIN
;
Wendy B. ABRAMSON
;
Minhthy N. MEINEKE
;
Timothy J. FURNISH
;
Matthew W SWISHER
;
Rodney A. GABRIEL
Author Information
- Publication Type:Clinical Research Article
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2020;73(3):219-223
- CountryRepublic of Korea
-
Abstract:
Background:Several hospitals have implemented a multidisciplinary Acute Pain Service (APS) to execute surgery-specific opioid sparing analgesic pathways. Implementation of an anesthesia attending-only APS has been associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption, time to ambulation, and time to solid food intake for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the impact of introducing an APS trainee on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy during POD 0–3.
Methods:We performed a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study where we compared opioid consumption and hospital length of stay among two historical cohorts: attending-only APS service versus service involving a regional anesthesia fellow.
Results:In the matched cohorts, the median postoperative day (POD) 0–3 opioid use [25%, 75% quartile] for the single attending and trainee involvement cohort were 38.5 mg morphine equivalents (MEQ) [14.1 mg, 106.3 mg] and 50.4 mg MEQ [28.4 mg, 91.2 mg], respectively. The median difference was –9.8 mg MEQ (95% CI -30.7–16.5 mg; P = 0.43). There was no difference in hospital length of stay between both cohorts (P = 0.67).
Conclusions:We found that the addition of a regional anesthesia fellow to the APS team was not associated with statistically significant differences in total opioid consumption or hospital length of stay in this surgical population. The addition of trainees to the infrastructure, with vigilant supervision, is not associated with change in outcomes.
