Preliminary Result of Randomised Controlled Trial of Three Different Coated Archwires Part 1: Tooth Alignment and Coating Loss
- Author:
Hassanin Abdulkhabeer Ali Alyassiri
1
,
2
,
3
;
Anis Farhan Kamaruddin
1
,
2
,
3
;
Khoirulzariah Ismail
1
,
2
,
3
;
Noor Ayuni Ahmad Shafiai
1
,
2
,
3
;
Norma Ab Rahman
4
;
Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad
4
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Coated archwires, Coating loss, Randomised controlled trial, Tooth alignment
- From:Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2020;16(Supp 2, May):1-8
- CountryMalaysia
- Language:English
- Abstract: Introduction: Coated archwires improve aesthetics during orthodontic treatment. However, little is known regarding their clinical benefit. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared the tooth alignment (TA), coating loss (CL), colour change (∆E*), and patient perception of coated archwires with their controls. Details of ∆E* and perception were reported in the second part of the articles. Methods: This RCT was done at three centres. Participants were randomised to receive one of four treatment interventions using 0.014” superelastic coated nickel-titanium archwires from Orthocare, RMO, G&H, and conventional uncoated 3M Unitek® archwires. These archwires were ligated during bonding and collected after eighth week and questionnaires were distributed to participants in the experimental groups only. After removal, TA and CL were measured using Little’s Irregularity Index and Autodesk® AutoCAD® software, respectively. At the time of this preliminary reporting, 84 participants had completed the trial. Two archwires fractured and were excluded. Therefore, 166 archwires (n = 166) were analysed. Results: Only non-extraction cases showed statistically significant differences in TA change between all groups (p = 0.005) and RMO showed significantly lowest mean of TA (1.5 mm). RMO and Orthocare showed significant TA change in the upper and lower arches (p = 0.037, 0.048). CL was found to be insignificant for both extraction and non-extraction cases (p >0.05). Comparison between upper and lower arches revealed no significant difference in TA and CL in all groups (p >0.05). Conclusion: From this preliminary analysis, Orthocare provides better TA in non-extraction cases despite highest percentage of coating loss.
- Full text:11.2020my0695.pdf
