Effect of entecavir antiviral therapy alone or combined with interferon on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.09.013
- VernacularTitle:恩替卡韦单药与联合干扰素抗病毒治疗对慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌发生风险的影响
- Author:
Jing SUN
1
;
Lin ZHU
;
Xin CHI
;
Yixuan WANG
;
Huichun XING
Author Information
1. Third Department of Liver Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
hepatitis B, chronic;
carcinoma, hepatocellular;
interferons;
entecavir;
comparative study
- From:
Journal of Clinical Hepatology
2020;36(9):1975-1979
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of entecavir (ETV) alone or combined with interferon (IFN) on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for 409 patients with CHB who were admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital from January 2008 to December 2014, and according to their antiviral therapy, they were divided into ETV+IFN group with 169 patients (IFN treatment for ≥6 months) and ETV group with 240 patients (ETV treatment for ≥12 months). The patients were followed up to June 2019, and the development of HCC was the outcome event. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous variables between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables between two groups. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to eliminate baseline differences between groups, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to compare the incidence rate of HCC between groups, and the Cox proportional-hazards regression model analysis was used to investigate the risk factors for the development of HCC. ResultsThe median follow-up time in this study was 5.4 years (IQR: 4.9-7.9). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence rate of HCC between the two groups before and after PSM (before PSM: 1.2% vs 2.8%, χ2=1.423, P=0.233; after PSM: 1.7% vs 4.1%, χ2=1.676, P=0.195), and the subgroup analysis also showed no significant difference in the cumulative incidence rate of HCC between the two groups in the non-high risk population (1.3% vs 1.5%, χ2=0.335, P=0.563). The Cox proportional-hazards regression model showed that age was an independent risk factor for HCC (hazard ratio=1.107, 95% confidence interval: 1.005-1.219, P=0.038). ConclusionFor CHB patients without a high risk of cancer, compared with ETV monotherapy, ETV combined with IFN for at least 6 months does not significantly reduce the risk of HCC.
